BrockT.C. (1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. InGreenwaldA.G.BrockT.C.OstromT.M.(Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243–275). New York: Academic Press.
2.
BrunswikE. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology(International Encyclopedia of Unified Science Vols. I and II: Foundations of the Unity of Science. Vol. I, No. 10). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
EstesW.K. (1976). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37–64.
4.
GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD.(Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
HammondK.R. (1990). Functionalism and illusionism: Can integration be usefully achieved?InHogarthR.M.(Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 227–261). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
HirshleiferJ.GlazerA.HirshleiferD. (2006). Price theory and applications: Decisions, markets, and information. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
KahnemanD.FrederickS. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. InGilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD.(Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
McKenzieC.R.M.ChaseV.M.(in press). Why rare things are precious: The importance of rarity in lay inference. InToddP.M.GigerenzerG.The ABC Research Group(Eds.), Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9.
SiegelS. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.