Previous research has generally shown that people are loss averse; that is, they weigh losses more heavily than gains. In a series of three experiments, we found that for small outcomes, this pattern is reversed, and gains loom larger than losses. We explain this reversal on the basis of (a) the hedonic principle, which states that individuals are motivated to maximize pleasure and to minimize pain, and (b) the assumption that small losses are more easily discounted cognitively than large losses are.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
ArkesH.R.BlumerC. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140.
3.
BegganJ.K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 229–237.
4.
BellD.E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33, 1–27.
5.
CacioppoJ.T.GardnerW.L.BerntsonG.G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualization and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.
6.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
De DreuC.K.W.CarnevaleP.J.D.EmansB.J.M.Van de VliertE. (1994). Effects of gain-loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 90–107.
8.
FörsterJ.HigginsE.T.IdsonL.C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115–1131.
9.
GilbertD.T.MorewedgeC.K.RisenJ.L.WilsonT.D. (2004). Looking forward to looking backward: The misprediction of regret. Psychological Science, 15, 346–350.
10.
GilbertD.T.PinelE.C.WilsonD.T.BlumbergS.J.WheatleyT.P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638.
11.
HigginsE.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
12.
KahnemanD. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 296–312.
13.
KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ.L.ThalerR.H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.
15.
KahnemanD.SnellJ. (1992). Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 187–200.
16.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.
17.
KermerD.A.Driver-LinnE.WilsonT.D.GilbertD.T. (2006). Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psychological Science, 17, 649–653.
18.
KnetschJ.L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79, 1277–1284.
19.
LoomesG.SugdenR. (1987). Testing for regret and disappointment in choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 97, 118–129.
20.
MackenzieC. (1997). Where are the motives? A problem with evidence in the work of Richard Thaler. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 123–135.
21.
NovemskyN.KahnemanD. (2005a). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 119–128.
22.
NovemskyN.KahnemanD. (2005b). How do intentions affect loss aversion?Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 139–140.
23.
PrelecD.LoewensteinL. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37, 770–786.
24.
RussellJ.A.CarrollJ.M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.
25.
SchimmackU. (2001). Pleasure, displeasure, and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive?Cognition and Emotion, 15, 81–97.
26.
SchweitzerM. (1994). Disentangling status quo and omission effects: An experimental analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 457–476.
27.
SkinnerB.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
28.
StewartN.ChaterN.BrownG.D.A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26.
29.
ThorndikeE.L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.
30.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
31.
Van BeestI.Van DijkE.De DreuC.K.W.WilkeH.A.M. (2005). Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 609–617.
32.
Van DijkE.Van KnippenbergD. (1998). Trading wine: On the endowment effect, loss aversion and the comparability of consumer goods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 485–495.
33.
Van de VenN.ZeelenbergM.Van DijkE. (2005). Buying and selling exchange goods: Outcome information, curiosity and the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 459–468.
34.
WatsonD.TellegenA. (1999). Issues in the dimensional structure of affect: Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comments on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601–610.
35.
WeberB.J.ChapmanG.B. (2005). Playing for peanuts: Why is risk seeking more common for low-stakes gambles?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 31–46.
36.
WilsonT.D.GilbertD.T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.
