Abstract
Converging lines of evidence point to a strong link between action and perception. In this study, we show that this linkage plays a role in controlling the dynamics of binocular rivalry, in which two stimuli compete for perceptual awareness. Observers dichoptically viewed two dynamic rival stimuli while moving a computer mouse with one hand. When the motion of one rival stimulus was consistent with observers' own hand movements, dominance durations of that stimulus were extended and, remarkably, suppression durations of that stimulus were abbreviated. Additional measurements revealed that this change in rivalry dynamics was not attributable to observers' knowledge about the condition under test. Thus, self-generated actions can influence the resolution of perceptual conflict, even when the object being controlled falls outside of visual awareness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen
R.A.
Buneo
C.A.
(2002 ). Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex . Annual Review of Neuroscience , 25 , 189 –220 .
2.
Blake
R.
(2001 ). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies . Brain and Mind , 2 , 5 –38 .
3.
Blake
R.
(2002 ). Reconciling rival ideas about binocular rivalry . In
Harris
L.
Jenkins
M.
(Eds.) , Levels of perception (pp . 101 –126 ). New York : Springer-Verlag .
4.
Blake
R.
Logothetis
N.K.
(2002 ). Visual competition . Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 3 , 13 –21 .
5.
Blake
R.
Sobel
K.V.
Gilroy
L.A.
(2003 ). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations . Neuron , 39 , 869 –878 .
6.
Bossink
C.J.
Stalmeier
P.F.
deWeert
C.M.M.
(1993 ). A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry . Vision Research , 33 , 1413 –1419 .
7.
Botvinick
M.
Braver
T.
Barch
D.
Carter
C.
Cohen
J.
(2001 ). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control . Psychological Review , 108 , 625 –652 .
8.
Breese
B.B.
(1909 ). Binocular rivalry . Psychological Review , 16 , 410 –415 .
9.
Carter
O.L.
Pettigrew
J.D.
(2003 ). A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?
Perception , 32 , 295 –305 .
10.
Dayan
P.
(1998 ). A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry . Neural Computation , 10 , 1119 –1135 .
11.
Dehaene
S.
Naccache
L.
(2001 ). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework . Cognition , 79 , 1 –37 .
12.
Fang
F.
He
S.
(2005 ). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways . Nature Neuroscience , 8 , 1380 –1385 .
13.
Fox
R.
Herrmann
J.
(1967 ). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations . Perception & Psychophysics , 2 , 432 –436 .
14.
Gibson
J.J.
(1979 ). The ecological approach to visual perception . Boston : Houghton Mifflin .
15.
Gilroy
L.A.
Blake
R.
(2004 ). Physics embedded in visual perception of three-dimensional shape from motion . Nature Neuroscience , 7 , 921 –922 .
16.
Goodale
M.A.
Milner
A.D.
(1992 ). Separate visual pathways for perception and action . Trends in Neurosciences , 15 , 20 –25 .
17.
Jacobs
A.
Shiffrar
M.
(2005 ). Walking perception by walking observers . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 31 , 157 –169 .
18.
James
W.
(1891 ). The principles of psychology . London : Macmillan .
19.
Kunde
W.
(2004 ). Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effects . Psychological Research , 68 , 91 –96 .
20.
Laing
C.R.
Chow
C.C.
(2002 ). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry . Journal of Computational Neuroscience , 12 , 39 –53 .
21.
Leopold
D.
Logothetis
N.
(1999 ). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 3 , 254 –264 .
22.
Levelt
W.
(1965 ). On binocular rivalry . Soesterberg, The Netherlands : Institute for Perception RVO-TNO .
23.
Logothetis
N.K.
(1998 ). Single units and conscious vision . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B , 353 , 1801 –1818 .
24.
Mayr
U.
(2004 ). Conflict, consciousness and control . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 8 , 145 –148 .
25.
Prinz
W.
Hommel
B.
(Eds.) . (2002 ). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIV . Oxford, England : Oxford University Press .
26.
Sobel
K.V.
Blake
R.
(2002 ). How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry . Perception , 31 , 813 –824 .
27.
Thornton
I.M.
Hayes
A.E.
(2004 ). Anticipating action in complex scenes . Visual Cognition , 11 , 341 –370 .
28.
Tong
F.
Meng
M.
Blake
R.
(2006 ). Neural bases of binocular rivalry . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 10 , 502 –511 .
29.
Wilson
H.R.
(2003 ). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 100 , 14499 –14503 .
30.
Wohlschläger
A.
(2000 ). Visual motion priming by invisible actions . Vision Research , 40 , 925 –930 .