How people understand the actions of animate agents has been vigorously debated. This debate has centered on two hypotheses focused on anatomically distinct neural substrates: The mirror-system hypothesis proposes that the understanding of others is achieved via action simulation, and the social-network hypothesis proposes that such understanding is achieved via the integration of critical biological properties (e.g., faces, affect). In this study, we assessed the areas of the brain that were engaged when people interpreted and imagined moving shapes as animate or inanimate. Although observing and imagining the moving shapes engaged the mirror system, only activation of the social network was modulated by animacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdolphsR. (2001). The neurobiology of social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 231–239.
2.
AllisonT.PuceA.McCarthyG. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 267–278.
3.
BarrettH.C.BehneT. (2005). Children's understanding of death as the cessation of agency: A test using sleep versus death. Cognition, 96, 93–108.
4.
BeauchampM.S.LeeK.E.HaxbyJ.V.MartinA. (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34, 149–159.
5.
CarrL.IacoboniM.DubeauM.-C.MazziottaJ.C.LenziG.L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 5497–5502.
6.
CastelliF.HappéF.FrithU.FrithC. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage, 12, 314–325.
7.
CoxR.W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29, 162–173.
8.
DaprettoM.DaviesM.S.PfeiferJ.H.ScottA.A.SigmanM.BookheimerS.Y.IacoboniM. (2006). Understanding emotions in others: Mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 28–30.
9.
DecetyJ.GrèzesJ.CostesN.PeraniN.JeannerodM.ProcykE.. (1997). Brain activity during observation of actions: Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain, 120, 1763–1777.
10.
GalleseV.KeysersC.RizzolattiG. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396–403.
11.
HadjikhaniN.JosephR.M.SnyderJ.Tager-FlusbergH. (2005). Anatomical differences in the mirror neuron system and social cognition network in autism. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1276–1282.
12.
HeiserM.IacoboniM.MaedaF.MarcusJ.MazziottaJ.C. (2003). The essential role of Broca's area in imitation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1123–1128.
13.
IacoboniM.Molnar-SzakacsI.GalleseV.BuccinoG.MazziottaJ.C.RizzolattiG. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. Public Library of Science: Biology, 3, 1–7.
14.
IacoboniM.WoodsR.P.BrassM.BekkeringH.MazziottaJ.C.RizzolattiG. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.
15.
IshaiA.UngerleiderL.G.HaxbyJ.V. (2000). Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images. Neuron, 28, 379–390.
16.
KeysersC.WickersB.GazzolaV.AntonJ.-L.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2004). A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron, 42, 335–346.
17.
LegersteeM. (1992). A review of the animate-inanimate distinction in infancy: Implications for models of social and cognitive knowing. Early Development and Parenting, 2, 59–67.
18.
MartinA.WeisbergJ. (2003). Neural foundations for understanding social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 575–587.
19.
MitchellJ.P.HeathertonT.F.MacraeC.N. (2002). Distinct neural systems serve person and object knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 15238–15243.
20.
OchsnerK.N.KnierimK.LudlowD.HanelinJ.RamachandranT.MackeyS. (2004). Reflecting upon feelings: An fMRI study of neural systems supporting the attribution of emotion to self and other. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1746–1772.
21.
O'CravenK.KanwisherN. (2000). Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1013–1023.
22.
Poulin-DuboisD.LepageA.FerlandD. (1996). Infants' concept of animacy. Cognitive Development, 11, 19–36.
23.
PremackD. (1990). The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36, 1–16.
24.
RizzolattiG.CraigheroL. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
25.
RizzolattiG.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.
26.
SaxeR. (2005). Against simulation: The argument from error. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 174–179.
27.
SchultzJ.FristonK.J.O'DohertyJ.WolpertD.M.FrithC. (2005). Activation in posterior superior temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron, 45, 625–635.
28.
TalairachJ.TournouxP. (1988). A co-planar stereotaxic atlas of a human brain. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme-Verlag.
29.
Thompson-SchillS.L.BednyM.GoldbergR.F. (2005). The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 219–224.
30.
WagnerA.D.ShannonB.J.KahnI.BucknerR.L. (2005). Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 445–453.
