Results from five studies of real-life decision making are compared. In these studies, participants consistently constrained the amount of information they considered to relatively few options and to a somewhat larger set of criteria. Over time, the number of options considered shrank, but the number of criteria used did not. People's intuitive “calibration” with the predictions of normative linear models is surprisingly good. Although there are effects of education and ability on the amount of information considered, different decision-making styles correlate mostly with affective reactions to, and subjective descriptions of, the approach to a specific decision. Implications for theoretical models of decision making are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeachL.R. (1993). Broadening the definition of decision making: The role of prechoice screening of options. Psychological Science, 4, 215–220.
BrandstätterE.GigerenzerG.HertwigR. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113, 409–432.
4.
ByrnesJ.P. (1998). The nature and development of decision-making: A self-regulation model. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
CookseyR.W. (1996). The methodology of social judgement theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 141–173.
6.
DawesR.M. (1982). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision-making. InKahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA.(Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp.391–407). New York: Cambridge University Press.
GalottiK.M. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 331–351.
9.
GalottiK.M. (1995a). A longitudinal study of real-life decision making: Choosing a college. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 459–484.
10.
GalottiK.M. (1995b). Memories of a “decision-map”: Recall of a real-life decision. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 307–319.
11.
GalottiK.M. (1999). Making a “major” real-life decision: College students choosing an academic major. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 379–387.
12.
GalottiK.M. (2001). Self-education and real-life decision structuring: Prenatal and birthing decisions. Unpublished manuscript, Carleton College, Northfield, MN.
13.
GalottiK.M. (2002). Making decisions that matter: How people face important life choices. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
GalottiK.M.CinerE.AltenbaumerH.A.GeertsH.J.RuppA.WoulfeJ.M. (2006). Making a ‘major’ life-framing decision: Individual differences in performance and affective reactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 629–639.
15.
GalottiK.M.KozbergS.F. (1996). Adolescents' experience of a life-framing decision. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 3–16.
16.
GalottiK.M.MarkM.C. (1994). How do high school students structure an important life decision? A short-term longitudinal study of the college decision-making process. Research in Higher Education, 35, 589–607.
17.
GalottiK.M.PierceB.ReimerR.L.LucknerA.E. (2000). Midwife or doctor: A study of pregnant women making childbirth decisions. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 45, 320–329.
18.
GigerenzerG.GoldsteinD.G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.
19.
KeeneyR.L. (1992). On the foundations of prescriptive decision analysis. InEdwardsW.(Ed.), Utility theories: Measurements and applications (pp.57–72). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
20.
KleinG. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
LooR. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 895–905.
22.
PayneJ.W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–387.
23.
PayneJ.W.BettmanJ.R.JohnsonE.J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
PerkinsD.N. (1985). Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 562–571.
25.
ReillyB.A.DohertyM.E. (1989). A note on the assessment of self-insight in judgment research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 123–131.
26.
ScottS.G.BruceR.A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818–831.
27.
SimonH.A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.
28.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
29.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
