Recent research has shown that four small dots presented in the vicinity of, but not adjacent to, a target stimulus can banish that stimulus from conscious awareness. It is thought that the mental representation of the masked stimulus is “erased” by the trailing quartet of dots. Using functional magnetic resonance adaptation, we show that there is no persisting neural representation of the successfully masked stimulus in lateral occipital cortex, a region that has been implicated in the processing of object structure. This finding rules out the alternative interpretation that a lingering neural representation is merely rendered inaccessible to consciousness, as is the fate, for example, of monocular information under conditions of binocular rivalry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarM.TootellR.B.H.SchacterD.L.GreveD.N.FischlB.MendolaJ.D.RosenB.R.DaleA.M. (2001). Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron, 29, 529–535.
2.
BlakeR. (1997). What can be “perceived” in the absence of visual awareness?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 157–162.
3.
BrainardD.H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
4.
BreitmeyerB.G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BreitmeyerB.G.RoT.OgmenH. (2004). A comparison of masking by visual and transcranial magnetic stimulation: Implications for the study of conscious and unconscious visual processing. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 829–843.
DeYoeE.A.CarmanG.J.BandettiniP.GlickmanS.WieserJ.CoxR.MillerD.NeitzJ. (1996). Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 2382–2386.
8.
Di LolloV.EnnsJ.T.RensinkR.A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481–507.
9.
EnnsJ.T.Di LolloV. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135–139.
10.
GreenM.F.GlahnD.EngelS.A.NuechterleinK.H.SabbF.StrojwasM.CohenM.S. (2005). Regional brain activity associated with visual backward masking. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 13–23.
11.
Grill-SpectorK. (2003). The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 159–166.
12.
Grill-SpectorK.KushnirT.HendlerT.MalachR. (2000). The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 837–843.
13.
Grill-SpectorK.MalachR. (2001). fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107, 293–321.
14.
HeS.MacLeodD.I. (2001). Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns. Nature, 411, 473–476.
15.
KeysersC.PerrettD.I. (2002). Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 120–125.
16.
KilleenP.R. (2005). An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science, 16, 345–353.
17.
KourtziZ.KanwisherN. (2001). Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science, 293, 1506–1509.
18.
KovacsG.VogelsR.OrbanG.A. (1995). Cortical correlate of pattern backward masking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92, 5587–5591.
19.
LlerasA.MooreC.M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 106–120.
