The assumption that implicit measures assess associations that are not accessible to consciousness abounds in current social cognition research. In the present report, we question this assumption, focusing on the construct of implicit self-esteem as a case in point. Although researchers often argue that implicitly measured self-esteem is unconscious, we provide evidence that it is not, and that discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem are the result of reporting tendencies. Study 1 demonstrated that individuals for whom explicitly measured self-esteem is relatively high and implicitly measured self-esteem is relatively low admit to overpresenting themselves. In Study 2, implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem were related when subjects were urged to avoid over- or underpresenting themselves when responding to the explicit measures. We discuss the critical distinction between awareness of one's attitudes and awareness of their influence.
BaumeisterR.F.TiceD.M.HuttonD.G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547–579.
3.
BlantonH.JaccardJ. (2006). Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: A case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 113, 155–169.
4.
BossonJ.K.SwannW.B.Jr.PennebakerJ. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631–643.
5.
DijksterhuisA.AlbersL.W.BongersK.C.(in press).Digging for the real attitude: Lessons from research on implicit and explicit self-esteem. InPettyR.E.FazioR.H.BriñolP.(Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
FazioR.H.JacksonJ.R.DuntonB.C.WilliamsC.J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.
7.
FazioR.H.OlsonM.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
8.
FazioR.H.Towles-SchwenT. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. InChaikenS.TropeY.(Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp.97–116). New York: Guilford.
9.
FreudS. (1957). The unconscious. InStracheyJ.(Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp.159–215). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1915)
10.
GreenwaldA.G.FarnhamS.D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038.
11.
GreenwaldA.G.NosekB.A.BanajiM.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
12.
HettsJ.J.PelhamB.W. (2001). A case for the nonconscious self-concept. InMoskowitzG.W.(Ed.), Cognitive social psychology (pp.105–123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
HettsJ.J.SakumaM.PelhamB.W. (1999). Two roads to positive regard: Implicit and explicit self-evaluation and culture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 512–559.
14.
JonesJ.T.PelhamB.W.MirenbergM.C.HettsJ.J. (2002). Name letter preferences are not merely mere exposure: Implicit egotism as self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 170–177.
15.
JordanC.H.SpencerS.J.ZannaM.P.Hoshino-BrowneE.CorrellJ. (2003). Secure and defensive self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969–978.
16.
KernisM.H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.
17.
KitayamaS.UchidaY. (2003). Explicit self-criticism and implicit self-regard: Evaluating self and friend in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 476–482.
18.
KooleS.L.DijksterhuisA.van KnippenbergA. (2001). What's in a name: Implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 669–685.
19.
KooleS.L.PelhamB.W. (2003). On the nature of implicit self-esteem: The case of the name letter effect. InSpencerS.FeinS.ZannaM.P.(Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario Symposium (pp.93–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
KrisA.O. (1994). Freud's treatment of a narcissistic patient. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 649–664.
21.
NisbettR.WilsonT. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
22.
OlsonM.A.FazioR.H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667.
23.
PelhamB.W.KooleS.L.HardinC.D.HettsJ.J.SeahE.DeHartT. (2005). Gender moderates the relation between implicit and explicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 84–89.
24.
PelhamB.W.MirenbergM.C.JonesJ.K. (2002). Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: Implicit egotism and major life decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 469–487.
25.
RichesonJ.A.SheltonJ.N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287–290.
26.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
RudmanL.A.KilianskiS.E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315–1328.
28.
SpaldingL.R.HardinC.D. (1999). Unconscious unease and self-handicapping: Behavioral consequences of individual differences in implicit and explicit self-esteem. Psychological Science, 10, 535–539.
