Mediation models are widely used, and there are many tests of the mediated effect. One of the most common questions that researchers have when planning mediation studies is, “How many subjects do I need to achieve adequate power when testing for mediation?” This article presents the necessary sample sizes for six of the most common and the most recommended tests of mediation for various combinations of parameters, to provide a guide for researchers when designing studies or applying for grants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. InKuhlJ.BeckmanJ.(Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2.
BaronR.M.KennyD.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
3.
CohenJ. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249–253.
4.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
CohenJ. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
6.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS.G.AikenL.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
ColeD.A.MaxwellS.E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.
8.
EfronB.TibshiraniT.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
9.
HolmbeckG.N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.
10.
HoyleR.H.KennyD.A. (1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. InHoyleR.H.(Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 195–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
JuddC.M.KennyD.A. (1981a). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12.
JuddC.M.KennyD.A. (1981b). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.
13.
KennyD.A.KashyD.A.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. InGilbertD.T.FiskeS.T.LindzeyG.(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
LomnickiZ.A. (1967). On the distribution of the product of random variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 29, 513–524.
15.
MacKinnonD.P.FritzM.S.WilliamsJ.LockwoodC.M.(in press). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavioral Research Methods.
16.
MacKinnonD.P.LockwoodC.M. (2001). Distribution of products tests for the mediated effect. Unpublished manuscript, Arizona State University, Tempe.
17.
MacKinnonD.P.LockwoodC.M.HoffmanJ.M.WestS.G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–103.
18.
MacKinnonD.P.LockwoodC.M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
19.
MacKinnonD.P.WarsiG.DwyerJ.H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62.
20.
ManlyB.F. (1997). Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. New York: Chapman and Hall.
21.
MeekerW.Q.Jr.CornwellL.W.AroianL.A. (1981). The product of two normally distributed random variables. InKennedyW.J.OdehR.E.(Eds.), Selected tables in mathematical statistics (Vol. VII). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
NeymanJ.PearsonE.S. (1933). The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24, 492–510.
24.
R Development Core Team. (2006). R (Version 2.2.0) [Computer program]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
25.
SAS Institute. (2004). SAS (Version 8.02) [Computer program]. Cary, NC: Author.
26.
ShroutP.E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
27.
SobelM.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. InLeinhardtS.(Ed.), Sociological methodology, 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
28.
SpringerM.D.ThompsonW.E. (1966). The distribution of independent random variables. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 14, 511–526.
