DrizinS.A.LeoR.A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.
2.
DrizinS.A.ReichM.J. (2004). Heeding the lessons of history: The need for mandatory recording of police interrogations to accurately assess the reliability and voluntariness of confessions. Drake Law Review, 52, 619–646.
3.
DwyerJ.NeufeldP.ScheckB. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday.
4.
GuthrieC.RachlinskiJ.J.WistrichA.J. (2002). Judging by heuristic: Cognitive illusions in judicial decision making. Judicature, 86, 44–50.
5.
Jacksonv. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964).
6.
KassinS.M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.
7.
KassinS.M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk?American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.
8.
LassiterG.D. (2002). Illusory causation in the courtroom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 204–208.
9.
LassiterG.D.GeersA.L.MunhallP.J.HandleyI.M.BeersM.J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera?InZannaM.P.(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 189–254). New York: Academic Press.
MannS.VrijA.BullR. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–149.
13.
McArthurL.Z. (1980). Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 507–519.
14.
RatcliffJ.J.LassiterG.D.SchmidtH.C.SnyderC.J. (2006). Camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions: Experimental evidence of its perceptual basis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 197–206.
15.
TaylorS.E.FiskeS.T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. InBerkowitzL.(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249–288). New York: Academic Press.
16.
WesselE.DrevlandG.C.B.EilertsenD.E.MagnussenS. (2006). Credibility of the emotional witness: A study of ratings by court judges. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 221–230.