Concept learning and learning strategies of pigeons were manipulated in a matching-to-sample task. Groups of 4 pigeons responded either 0, 1, 10, or 20 times to a sample stimulus, and then chose between a matching comparison stimulus and a nonmatching comparison stimulus. Tests with unfamiliar arrangements of the three training stimuli showed that learning was not by if-then rules. Tests with novel stimuli showed that as the number of sample responses increased, learning about the configural pattern of each display gave way to more learning about the sample-comparison relationship and more concept learning. Pigeons making the most sample responses showed complete concept learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerrymanR.CummingW.W.CohenL.R.JohnsonD.F. (1965). Acquisition and transfer of simultaneous oddity. Psychological Reports, 17, 767–775.
2.
CarterD.E.EckermanD.A. (1975), Symbolic matching by pigeons: Rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations. Science, 187, 662–664.
3.
CarterD.E.WemerT.J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565–601.
4.
CummingW.W.BerrymanR.CohenL.R. (1965), Acquisition and transfer of zero delay matching. Psychological Reports, 17, 435–445.
5.
DaehlerMW.BukatkoD. (1985), Cognitive development. New York: Knopf.
6.
D'AmatoM.R.SalmonD.P.ColomboM. (1985). Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apeila). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 35–51.
7.
FarthingG.W.OpudaM.J. (1974). Transfer of matching-to-sample in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 199–213.
8.
HaysW.L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt. Rinehart. & Winston.
9.
HolmesP.W. (1979). Transfer of matching performance in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 103–114.
10.
LombardiC.M.FachinelliC.C.DeliusJ.D. (1984), Oddity of visual pattems conceptualized by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 12, 2–6.
11.
NisbenR.E. (1993). Rules for reasoning, Hillsdale., NJ: Eribaum.
PetriH.L.MishkinM. (1994). Behaviorism, cognitivism and the neuropsychology of memory, American Scientist, 82, 30–37.
15.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1969). The psychology of the child (WeaverH., Trans.). New York: Basic Books, (Original work published 1966).
16.
PisacretaR.RedwoodE.WittK. (1984). Transfer of matching-to-figure samples m the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 223–237.
17.
PremackD. (1978). On the abstractness of human concepts: Why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. InHulseS.H.FowlerH.HonigW.K. (Eds.). Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp.423–451). Hillsdale., NJ: Eribaum.
18.
PremackD. (1983). Animal cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 351–362.
19.
SacksR.A.KamilA.C.MackR. (1972), The effects of fixed-ratio sample requirements on matching-to-sample in the pigeon, Psychonomic Science, 26, 291–293.
20.
SantiA. (1978). The role of physical identity of the sample and correct comparison stimulus in matching-to-sample paradigms. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 511–516.
21.
SantiA. (1982), Hue matching and hue oddity in pigeons: Is explicit training not to peck incorrect hue combinations a sufficient condition for transfer?Psychological Record. 32, 61–73.
22.
SkinnerB.F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary?Psychological Review. 57, 193–216.
23.
SokalR.RRohlfF.J. (1969), Biometry, San Francisco: Freeman.
24.
UrcuioliP.J.HonigW.K. (1980), Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 6, 251–277.
25.
UrcuioliP.J.NevinJ.A. (1975), Transfer of hue matching in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 149–155.
26.
VaughanW.Jr.GreeneS.L. (1983), Acquisition of absolute discriminations in pigeons. InCommonsM.L.HermsteinR.J. (Eds.). Quantitative analysis of behavior (Vol. IV. pp.231–238), New York: Harper & Row.
27.
WilliamsB.A. (1971). Color altemation learning in the pigeon under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 129–140.
28.
WilsonB.MackintoshN.J.BoakesR.A. (1985), Matching and oddity learning in the pigeon: Transfer effects and the absence of relational learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 37, 295–311.
29.
WrightA.A.CookR.G.RiveraJ.J.SandsS.F.DeliusJ.D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching to sample with trial-unique video picture stimuliAnimal Learning and Behavior. 16, 436–444.
30.
WrightA. A.SantiagoH.C.SandsS.F.UrcuioliP.J. (1984), Pigeon and monkey serial probe recognition: Acquisition, strategies, and serial position effects. InRoitblatH.L.BeverT.G.TerraceH.S. (Eds). Animal cognition (pp.353–374), Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
31.
ZentallT.R.EdwardsC.A.MooreB.S.HoganD.E. (1981), Identity: The basis for both matching and oddity beaming in pigeons, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7. 70–86.
32.
ZentallT.R.HoganD.E. (1978). Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: The effect of negative instance and prior adaptation to transfer stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 177–186.
