Actors view behavior relevant for personality traits as more variable than observers do This study was designed to replicate this actor-observer effect (AOE) in a common-target paradigm, test whether actors, observers, or both are intuitively aware of the AOE, and examine the effects of social projection on people's awareness of the AOE Within each actor-observer pair, subjects described the actor on a series of trait adjectives and rated the consistency of relevant behavior They then predicted the other person's ratings The AOE emerged, and actors, but not observers, were aware of the effect On average, actors correctly predicted that observers rated actors' behavior as more consistent than actors themselves did Correlational analyses showed that actors and observers were equally prone to project their own ratings to their matched partners
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaxterT.L.GoldbergL.R. (1987). Perceived behavioral consistency underlying trail attributions to oneself and another. An extension of the actor observer effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletion, 13, 437–447.
2.
BlassT.KaplowitzH. (1990). A longitudinal study of the actor-observer attributional effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 259–264.
3.
DawesR.M.SingerD.LemonsF. (1972). An experimental analysis of the contrast effect and its implications for intergroup communication and the indirect assessment of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 281–295.
4.
DuvalS.WicklundR.A. (1973). Effects of objective self-awareness. on attribution of causality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 17–31.
5.
FrankM.C.GilovichT. (1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 399–403.
6.
FunderD.C. (1980). The trait of ascribing traits. Individual differences in the tendency to trait ascription. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 376–385.
7.
GalperR.E. (1976). Turning observers into actors. Differential casual attributions as a function of empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 328–335.
8.
GoldbergL.R. (1978). Differential attribution of trait-descriptive terms to oneself as compared to well-liked neutral and disliked others. A psychometric analysis, Journal of Personality, 36, 1012–1028.
9.
GoldbergL.R. (1981). Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral and ambiguous ones. A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 517–552.
10.
JonesE.E.NisbeltR.E. (1971). The actor and the observer Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. InJonesE.E.KanouseD.E.KelleyH.H.NisbettR.E.ValinsS.WeinerB., (Eds.), Attribution Perceiving the causes of behaviour, (pp.79–94), Morristown, NJGeneral Learning Press.
11.
KelleyH.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. InLevineD., (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, (Vol. 15, pp.192–241), LincolnUniversity of Nebraska Press.
12.
KruegerJ.ClementR.W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect. An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.
13.
KruegerJ.ClementR.W. (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics. Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 12, 52–68.
14.
KruegerJ.RothbartM. (1990). Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 651–663.
15.
KruegerJ.ZeigerJ.S. (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670–680.
16.
LinvilleP.W.FischerG.W.SaloveyP. (1989). Perceived distributions of in-group and out-group members. Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165–188.
17.
NisbettR.E.CaputoC.LegantP.MarecekJ. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164.
18.
PrenticeD.A. (1990). Familiarity and differences in self and other representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 369–383.
19.
ReganD.T.TottenJ. (1975). Empathy and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 850–856.
20.
RobinsR.W.SprancaM.D.MendelsobnG.A. (in press). The actor-observer effect revisited. Effects of individual differences and repealed social interactions on actor and observer attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
21.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The ‘false consensus effect. An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.
22.
SmithE.R. (1984). Attributions and other inferences, Processing information about the self versus others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 97–115.
23.
SmithE.R.ZárateM.A. (1992). Exemplar-based models of social judgment. Psychology Review, 99, 3–21.
24.
StormsM.D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process. Reversing actors and observers points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164.
25.
WatsonD. (1982). The actor and the observer. How are their perceptions of causality different?Psychological Bulletin, 92, 682–700.
26.
WegenerD.T.PettyR.E. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment. Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137–165.
