AstingtonJ.W.GopnikA. (1991), Theoretical explanations of children's understanding of the mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 7–31.
2.
BatesE.ElmanJ.L. (1993), Connectionism and the study of changeinJohnsonM.H., (Ed.), Brain development and cognition. A reader (pp.2–23), Oxford, EnglandBlackwell.
3.
BrunerJ. (1990), Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press.
4.
CareyS. (1985), Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MAMIT Press.
5.
CareyS. (1988) Conceptual differences between children and adults. Mind and Language, 3, 167–183.
6.
CaseR. (1985), Intellectual development A systematic reinterpretation. New YorkAcademic Press.
7.
ChomskyN. (1980), Rules and representations. Oxford, EnglandBasil Black well.
8.
ChomskyN. (1986), Knowledge of language. BerlinPraeger.
DemetriouA.EflkidesA.PlatsidouM. (1993). The architecture and dynamics of developing mind, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(5–6, Serial No. 234).
11.
FischerK.W. (1980), A theory of cognitive development, The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531.
12.
FodorJ.A. (1983), The modularity of mind, An essay on faculty psychologyCambridge, MAMIT Press/Bradford Books.
13.
FodorJ.A. (1992), A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition, 44, 283–296.
14.
GopnikA. (1984), Conceptual and semantic change in scientists and children. Why there are no semantic universals, Linguistics, 20, 163–179.
15.
GopnikA. (1988), Conceptual and semantic development as theory change. Mind and Language, 3, 197–217.
16.
GopnikA.MeltzoffA.N. (in press), Words, thoughts and theorie, Cambridge, MAMIT Press/Bradford Books.
17.
GopnikA.WellmanH.M. (1992), Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory?Mind and Language, 7, 145–171.
18.
GopnikA.WellmanH.M. (1994), The theory, theory. InHirschfieldL.GelmanS., (Eds.), Mapping the mind Domain specificity in culture and cognition (pp.257–293) New YorkCambridge University Press.
19.
HalfordG. (1982), The development of thoughtHillsdale, NJErlbaum.
20.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1988), The child is a theoretician, not an induitivist. Mind and Language, 3, 183–197.
Karmiloff-SmithA.LnhelderB. (1974), If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition, 3, 195–212.
23.
KeilF.C. (1989), Concepts kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MAMIT Press.
24.
LeslieA. (1988), Some implications of pretense for children's theories of mind, InArtingtonJ.W.HarrisP.L.OlsonD.R., (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp.19–46) Cambridge, MA. Cambridge University Press.
25.
MarcusG.PinkerS.UllmanM.HollanderM.RosenT.J.XuF. (1992) Overregularization in language acquisition, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development57 (4 Serial No 228).
26.
MeltzoffA.N.GopnikA. (1993), The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind, InBaron-CohenS.Tajer-FlusbergH.CohenD., (Eds.), Understanding other minds Perspectives from autism (pp.335–366), Oxford, EnglandOxford University Press.
27.
NelsonK. (1986), Event knowledge Structure and function in development Hillidale, NJErlbaum.
28.
Pascual-LeoneJ. (1970), A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages, Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345.
29.
PernerJ. (1991), Understanding the representational mind, Cambridge, MAMIT Press.
30.
PinkerS. (1984), Language learnability and language developmentCambridge, MAHarvard University Press.
31.
PinkerS. (1989), Learnability and cognitionCambridge, MAMIT Press.
32.
RogoffB. (1990), Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social contest, Oxford, EnglandOxford University Press.