In this article, we propose and test a model of how readers construct representations of the situations described in simple narratives the event-indexing model According to the event-indexing model, events are the focal points of situations conveyed in narratives and are connected in memory along five dimensions time, space, protagonist, causality, and intentionality The results of a verb-clustering task provide strong support for the event-indexing model
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrittonB.K.GulgözS. (1991). Using Kintsch s computational model to improve instructional text. Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–345.
2.
FletcherC.R.ChryslerS.T. (1990). Surface forms textbases, and situation models. Recognition memory for three types of textual informationDiscourse Processes, 13, 175–190.
3.
GernsbacherM.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure buildingHillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
GivónT. (1993). Coherence in text, coherence in mind. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1, 171–227.
5.
GlenbergA.M.MeyerM.LindenK. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
6.
GraesserA.M. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer.
7.
GraesserA.C.ClarkL.F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Advances in discourse processes (Vol. XVII). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
Johnson-LairdP.N. (1983). Mental modelsCambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
9.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension. A con struction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
10.
KintschW. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories. The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. InHealyA.F.KosalynS.M.ShiffrinR.M., (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes. Essays in honor of Williams. K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp.261–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
KintschWvan DijkT.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
12.
KintschW.WelschD.SchmalhoferF.ZimnyS. (1990). Sentence memory. A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133–159.
13.
McKoonG.RatcliffR. (1992). Inference generation during reading. Psychological Review, 66, 440–466.
14.
McNamaraD.S.KintschE.SongerN.B.KintschW. (in press). Are gool texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge and levels of understanding in learning form text. Cognition and Instruction..
15.
MillerG.A.Johnson-LairdP.N. (1976). The perception of language. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
16.
MorrowD.G.BowerG.H.GreenspanS.L. (1989). Updating situation models during comprehensionJournal of Memory and Language, 13, 441–469.
17.
MorrowD.G.GreenspanS.L.BowerG.H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165–187.
18.
RatcliffR.McKoonG. (1978). Priming in item recognition. Evidence for the prepositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403–417.
19.
SchankR.C.AbelsonR.P. (1977). Scripts plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
TrabassoT.SperryL.L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611.
21.
van den BrockP. (1990). The causal inference maker. Towards a process model of inference making in text comprehension. InBalotaD.A.FloresG.B.ArcaisD.RaynerK., (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp, 423–445). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
van DijkT.A.KintschW. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
23.
ZwaanR.A. (1995). Processing narrative time shifts.. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
ZwaanR.A.MaglianoJ.P.GraesserA.C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental. Psychology Learning Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.
