Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The human visual system does not rigidly preserve the properties of the retinal image as neural signals are transmitted to higher areas of the brain Instead, it generates a representation that captures stable surface properties despite a retinal image that is often fragmented in space and time because of occlusion caused by object and observer motion The recovery of this coherent representation depends at least in part on input from an abstract representation of three-dimensional (3-D) surface layout In the two experiments reported, a stereoscopic apparent motion display was used to investigate the perceived continuity of a briefly interrupted visual object When a surface appeared in front of the object's location during the interruption, the object was more likely to be perceived as persisting through the interruption (behind an occluder) than when the surface appeared behind the object's location under otherwise identical stimulus conditions The results reveal the influence of 3-D surface-based representations even in very simple visual tasks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Assad

J.A.

Maunsell

J.H.R.

(1994). Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in macaque posterior parietal cortex [Abstract] Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35, 16–63.

Breitmeyer

B.G.

Ritter

(1986a). The role of visual pattern persistence in bistable stroboscopic motion Vision Research, 26, 1801–1806.

Breitmeyer

B.G.

Ritter

(1986b). Visual per sistence and the effect of eccentric viewing, element size and frame duration on bistable stroboscopic motion percepts Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 275–280.

Burt

Sperling

(1981). Time distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion Psychological Review, 88, 171–195.

Dawson

M.R.W.

(1991). The how and why of what went where in apparent motion Modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem Psychological Review, 98, 569–603.

DiLollo

(1980). Temporal integration in visual General, 109, 75–97.

Enns

J.T.

Rensink

R.A.

(in press) An object completion process in early vision In Gale

A.G.

, (Ed). Visual Search III. London Taylor & Francis.

Z.J.

Nakayama

(1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search Nature, 359, 231–233.

Z.J.

Nakayama

(1994). Perceived surface shape not features determines correspondence strength in apparent motion Vision Research, 34, 2125–2135.

10.

Kanizsa

(1979). Organization in vision New York Praeger.

11.

Kellman

P.J.

Shipley

T.F.

(1991) A theory of visual interpolation in object perception Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141–221.

12.

Kellman

P.J.

Shipley

T.F.

(1992) Perceiving objects across gaps in space and time Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 193–199.

13.

Koffka

(1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, Harcourt Brace.

14.

Michotte

Thinès

Crabbé

(1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures (E Miles & T. R. Miles, Trans) In Thinès

Costall

Butterworth

, (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140–167), Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum (Original work published 1964).

15.

Nakayama

Shimojo

(1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces Science, 257, 1357–1363.

16.

Palmer

Rock

(1994). Rethinking perceptual organization. The role of uniform connected ness Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29–55.

17.

Pantle

Picciano

(1976). A multistable movement display Evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision Science, 193, 500–502.

18.

Petry

Meyer

G.E.

, (Eds.), (1987). The perception of illusory contours. New York, Springer-Verlag.

19.

Ramachandran

V.S.

Anstis

S.M.

(1983) Perceptual organization in moving displays Nature, 304, 529–531.

20.

Ramachandran

V.S.

Inada

Kiama

(1986). Perception of illusory occlusion in apparent motion Vision Research, 26, 1741–1749.

21.

Rock

(1963). The logic of perception Cambridge, MA MIT Press.

22.

Sekuler

A.B.

(1994). Local and global minima in visual completion Effects of symmetry and orientation Perception, 23, 529–545.

23.

Sckuler

A.B.

Palmer

S.E.

(1992). Perception of partly occluded objects. A microgenetic analysis Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 121, 95–111.

24.

Shimojo

Nakayama

(1990). Amodal representation of occluded surfaces Role of invisible stimult in apparent motion correspondence Perception, 19, 285–299.

25.

Sigman

Rock

(1974). Stroboscopic movement based on perceptual intelligence Perception, 3, 9–28.

26.

Ternus

(1939). The problem of phenomenal identity. In Ellis

W.D.

, (Ed.)and Trans) A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 149–160), New York, Harcourt Brace & Co (Original work published 1926).

27.

Tipper

S.P.

Brehaut

J.C.

Driver

(1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492–504.

28.

Ullman

(1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.

29.

Watamamuk

S.N.J.

McKce

S.P.

Taylor

D.G.

(1994). Detecting a trajectory moving behind occluders [Abstract] Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35, 21–62.

30.

Yantis

(1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156–161.

31.

Yantis

Gibson

B.S.

(1994). Object continuity in apparent motion attention Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182–204.

Perceived Continuity of Occluded Visual Objects

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References