CohenJ.CohenP (1983) Applied multiple regression—correlational analysts for the behavior sciencesHilsdale, NJEribaum.
2.
DaveyB (1988) Factors affecting the difficulty of reading comprehension items for successful and unsuccessful readerJournal of Experimental Education5667–76.
3.
DrumP ACaffeeRCCookL K (1981) The effects of surface structure vanables on performance m reading comprehension testsReading Research Quarterly16, 486–514.
FarrRPritchardRSmittenB (1990) A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension testJournal of Educational Measurement27209–226.
6.
FreedleRKostinI (1991) The prediction of SAT reading comprehension Item difficulty for expository prose passages (ETS Research Report RR-91–29) Princeton NJEducational Testing Service.
7.
FreedleRKoslinI (1992) The prediction of GRE reading comprehension Item difficulty for expository prose passages for each of three item types Mam ideas inferences and explicit statements (ETS Research Report RR-91–S9) Princeton, NJEducational Testing Service.
8.
FreedleRKostmI (1993) The prediction of TOEFL reading item difficulty Implications for construct validityLanguage Testing10, 133–170.
9.
JohnstonP (1984) Prior knowledge and reading comprehension test biasReading Research Quarterly19219–239.
10.
JustMACarpenterP A (1987) The psychology of reading and language comprehensionBostonAllyn and Bacon.
11.
KatzSLautenschlagerGBlackburnAHamsF (1990) Answering reading comprehension items without passages on the SATPsychological Science1122–127.
12.
RoyerJ (1990) The sentence verification technique A new direction m the assessment of reading comprehensionInLeggSAlgmaJ, (Eds), Cognitive assessment of language and math outcomes (pp144–191) Norwood, NJAblex.
13.
TuinmanJJ (1973–1974) Determining the passage dependency of comprehension questions in 5 major testsReading Research Quarterly, 9, 206–223.
