AczélJ.RobertsF.S. (1989). On the possible merging functions. Mathematical Social Science, 17, 205–243.
2.
AlperT.M. (1987). A classification of all order-preserving homeomorphism groups of the reals that satisfy finite uniqueness. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 31, 135–154.
3.
CliffN. (1992). Abstract measurement theory and the revolution that never happened. Psychological Science, 3, 186–190.
4.
FalmagneJ.-C. (1985). Elements of psychophysical theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
FishburnP.C. (1982). The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
8.
KrantzD.H. (1972). A theory of magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9, 168–199.
9.
KrantzD.H.LuceR.D.SuppesP.TverskyA. (1971). Foundations of measurement: Vol. I. Additive and polynomial representations. New York: Academic Press.
10.
LuceR.D. (1990). “On the possible psychophysical laws” revisited: Remarks on cross-modal matching. Psychological Review, 97, 66–77.
11.
LuceR.D.KrantzD.H.SuppesP.TverskyA. (1990). Foundations of measurement: Vol. III. Representation, axiomatization, and invariance. New York: Academic Press.
12.
NarensL. (1981a). A general theory of ratio scalability with remarks about the measurement-theoretic concept of meaningfulness. Theory and Decision, 13, 1–70.
13.
NarensL. (1981b). On the scales of measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24, 249–275.
14.
NarensL. (1985). Abstract measurement theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
NarensL. (1993). A theory of magnitude estimation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16.
NarensL.LuceR.D. (1983). How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utility. Theory and Decision, 15, 247–260.
17.
RieferD.M.BatchelderW.H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318–339.
18.
RobertsF.S. (1979). Measurement theory with applications to decision making, utility, and the social sciences. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
SavageL.J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
20.
ShepardR.N. (1981). Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24, 21–57.
21.
StevensS.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.
22.
StevensS.S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. InStevensS.S., (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.
23.
SuppesP.KrantzD.H.LuceR.D.TverskyA. (1989). Foundations of measurement: Vol. II. Geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations. New York: Academic Press.
24.
von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
WakkerP.P. (1989). Additive representations of preferences: A new foundation of decision analysis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.