Human subjects received feedback showing how closely their responses approximated the chaotic output of the logistic difference function. In Experiment 1, subjects generated analog responses by placing a pointer along a line. In Experiment 2, they generated digital responses in the form of three-digit numbers. In Experiment 3, feedback was sometimes provided and other times withheld. Responses came to approximate three defining characteristics of logistic chaos: Sequences were “noisy,” they were extremely sensitive to initial conditions, and lag 1 autocorrelation functions were parabolic in form. Chaos theory may describe some highly variable although precisely determined human behaviors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerG.L.GollubJ.P. (1990). Chaotic dynamics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2.
CampbellD. (1989). Introduction to nonlinear phenomena. InSteinD., (Ed.), Lectures in the sciences of complexity (SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, pp. 3–105). New York: Addison-Wesley.
EstesW.K. (1988), Human learning and memory. InAtkinsonR.C.HerrnsleinR.JLindzeyG.LuceR.D. (Eds). Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, second edition: Vol, 2. Learning and cognition (pp. 351–415). New York: Wiley.
5.
GlassL.MackeyM.C. (1988). From clocks to chaos: The rhythms of life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
GleikJ. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.
7.
HoyertM.S. (1992). Order and chaos in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 339–363.
8.
JensenR.V. (1987). Classical chaos. American Scientist, 75, 168–181.
9.
KrasnerS. (Ed.). (1990). The ubiquity of chaos. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
10.
MayR.M. (1987). Chaos and the dynamics of biological populations. InBerryM.V.PeravalI.C.WeissN.O., (Eds.), Dynamical chaos (pp. 27–44). Princeton., NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
MosekildeE.LarsenE.StermanJ. (1991). Coping with complexity: Deterministic chaos in human decisionmaking behavior. InCastiJ.L.KarlqvistA., (Eds.), Beyond belief: Randomness, prediction and explanation in science (pp. 199–229). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12.
NeuringerA. (1986). Can people behave “randomly”?: The role of feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 115, 62–75.
13.
StewartI. (1989). Does God play dice?Cambridge., MA: Basil Blackwell.
14.
TownsendJ.T. (1992). Chaos theory: A brief tutorial and discussion. InHealyA.F.KosslynS.M.ShiffrinR.M., (Eds.), From learning theory to connectioniw theory: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 1, pp. 65–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
