A formal proof is provided that Anderson's (1990) rational model of categorization generalizes the Medin and Schaffer (1978) context model. According to the context model, people represent categories by storing individual exemplars in memory. According to the rational model, people represent categories in terms of multiple exemplar-clusters or prototypes. In both models, a multiplicative rule is used to compute the similarity of an item to the underlying category representations. In certain special cases, each multiple prototype in the rational model corresponds to an individual exemplar, and in these cases the rational model reduces to the context model. Preliminary quantitative comparisons between the models are illustrated to test whether the multiple-prototype view adds significant explanatory power over the pure exemplar view.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ.R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
AndersonJ.R. (in press). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review.
3.
BusemeyerJ.R.DeweyG.I.MedinD.L. (1984). Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 10, 638–648.
GluckM.A.BowerG.H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 117, 227–247.
6.
GoldenR.M.RumelhartD.E. (1989). A relationship between the context model of classification and a connectionist learning rule. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
HeitE. (1990). Reasoning from examples. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
8.
MassaroD.W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
MassaroD.W.FriedmanD. (1990). Models of integration given multiple sources of information. Psychological Review, 97, 225–252.
10.
MedinD.L.AltomM.W.EdelsonS.M.FrekoD. (1982). Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 37–50.
11.
MedinD.L.AltomM.W.MurphyT.D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 3, 333–352.
12.
MedinD.L.DeweyG.I.MurphyT.D. (1983). Relationships between item and category learning: Evidence that abstraction is not automatic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 607–625.
13.
MedinD.L.EdelsonS.M. (1988). Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 68–85.
14.
MedinD.L.SchafferM.M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review. 85, 207–238.
15.
MedinD.L.SmithE.E. (1981). Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 241–253.
16.
NosofskyR.M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 104–114.
17.
NosofskyR.M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.
18.
NosofskyR.M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, A. Cognition, 13, 87–109.
19.
NosofskyR.M. (1988a). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700–708.
20.
NosofskyR.M. (1988b). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 54–65.
21.
NosofskyR.M. (1990). Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 393–418.
22.
NosofskyR.M. (1991a). Relation between the rational model and the context model of categorization. Cognitive Science Report #39, Indiana University.
23.
NosofskyR.M. (1991b). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 3–27.
24.
NosofskyR.M. (in press). Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. InHealyA.KosslynS.ShiffrinR., (Eds.), Essays in Honor of W.K. Estes.
25.
OdenG.C.MassaroD.W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception, Psychological Review, 85, 172–191.
26.
ShepardR.N. (1958). Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 509–523.
27.
ShepardR.N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54–87.
28.
ShepardR.N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
29.
ShepardR.N.ChangJ.J. (1963). Stimulus generalization in the learning of classifications, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 94–102.
30.
ShepardR.N.HovlandC.I.JenkinsH.M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75, (13, Whole No. 517).
