Article Commentary: Orientation-Dependent Mechanisms in Shape Recognition: Further Issues

Biederman I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–147.

Carpenter P.A. Just M.A. (1978). Eye fixations during mental rotation. In Senders J.W. Fisher D.F. Monty R.A. , (Eds.), Eve movements and the higher psychological functions. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.

Corballis M.C. (1988), Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95(1), 115–123.

Corballis M.C. Zbrodoff N.J. Shetzer L.I. Butler P.B. (1978). Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory & Cognition, 6, 98–107.

Johnson S.H. (1991). Commentary on Tarr and Pinker. Psychological Science, 2(2), 206–207.

Jolicoeur P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13(4), 289–303.

Jolicoeur P. Landau M.J. (1984). Effects of orientation on the identification of simple visual patterns. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38(1), 80–93.

Mart D. Nishihara H.K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Ser. B, 200, 269–294.

Shepard R.N. Cooper L.A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tarr M J. (1990). Rotating objects to recognize them: The effect of orientation on the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Submitted.

Tarr M.J. Pinker S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 233–282.

Tarr M.J. Pinker S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame?Psychological Science, 1(4), 253–256.

Ullman S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193–254.