An exponential-decay relationship between the probability of generalization and psychological distance has received considerable support from studies of stimulus generalization (Shepard, 1958) and categorization (Nosofsky, 1984). It is shown here how an approximate exponential generalization gradient emerges from stimulus representation assumptions isomorphic to a special case of Shepard's (1987) theory of stimulus generalization in a “configuralcue” network model of human learning that represents stimulus patterns in terms of elementary features and pairwise conjunctions of features (Gluck & Bower, 1988b; Gluck, Bower, & Hee, 1989). The network model can be viewed as a combination of Shepard's theory and an associative learning rule derived from Rescorla and Wagner's (1972) theory of classical conditioning.
EstesW.K.CampbellJ.A.HatsopoulosN. & HurwitzJ.B. (1989). Base-rate effects in category learning: A comparison of parallel network and memory storage–retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 15, 556–571.
3.
GluckM.A. & BowerG.H. (1988a). From conditioning to category learning. An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 225–244.
4.
GluckM. A. & BowerG.H. (1988b). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 166–195.
5.
GluckMA.BowerG.H. & HeeM.R. (1989). A confugural-cue network model of animal and human associative learning. InProceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Ann Arbor. Michigan, August 16–19, 1989 (pp.323–332). Hillsdale., NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
GluckM.A.BowerG.H. & HeeM.R. (1990). Animal arid human associative learning: A configuralcue network model. Unpublished manuscript, Dept- of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford., CA.
7.
GluckM.A.CorterJ.H. & BowerG.H. (1990). Basic levels in the learning of category hierarchies: An adaptive network model. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University. Stanford, CA.
8.
KehoeE.J. & GormezanoI. (1980). Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 351–378.
9.
MedinD.L. & SchafferM.M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
10.
MedinD.L. & SchwanenflugelP.J. (1978). Linear seperability in classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 355–368.
11.
NosofskyR.M. (1984), Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 10, 104–114.
ParkerD. (1986). A comparison of algorithms for neuron-like cells. InProceedings of the Neural Networks for Computing Conference (pp.327–332). Snowbird, UT:.
14.
RescoriaR.A. (1972). “Configural” conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 79, 307–317.
15.
RescorlaR.A. (1973). Evidence for “unique stimulus” account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 85, 331–338.
16.
RescoriaR.A. & WagnerA.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. InBlackA.H. & ProkasyW.F., (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp.64–99). New York: Appleton–Century-Crofts.
17.
RumelhartD.E.HintonG.E. & WilliamsR.J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. InRumelhartD. & Mc-ClellandJ., (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. I: Foundations) (pp, 318–362), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
RussellS.J. (1986), A quantitative analysis of analogy by similarity. InProceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp.284–288). Philadelphia., PA: AAAI.
19.
RussellS.J. (1988). Analogy by similarity. InHelmanD.H., (Ed.), Analogical reasoning: Perspective of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy (pp.251–269). Dordrecht, Holland: Klewer Academic Publishers.
20.
ShepardR.N. (1958). Stimulus and response generalization: Deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model. Psychological Review, 65, 242–256.
21.
ShepardR.N. (1987), Towards a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
22.
ShepardR.N. (1989). A law of generalization and connectionist learning. Talk presented at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Ann Arbor, MI, August 17–18.
23.
SmithE. & MedinD. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
WagnerA.R. & RescoriaR.A. (1973). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Applications of a theory. InBoakesR.A. & HallidayS., (Eds), Inhibition and teaming (pp, 301–336). New York: Academic Press.
25.
WerbosP. (1974). Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences. Doctoral dissertation(Economics), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
26.
WidrowB. & HoffM.E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. Institute of Radio Engineers. Western Electronic Show and Convention. Convention Record, 4, 96–194.
