Previous research on subjects showing the two temperamental profiles called inhibited and uninhibited to unfamiliar events suggests that the two groups differ in threshold of reactivity to novelty. Hence, variation among infants in behavioral reactivity to unfamiliar events might predict later display of the two profiles. In a longitudinal study of 94 four-month-old infants, those who displayed the combination of high motor activity and frequent crying to stimulation were more fearful to unfamiliar events at nine and 14 months than infants who displayed both low motor activity and infrequent crying. This result implies that the processes that mediate early reactivity to stimulation may also influence a later preparedness to avoid or to approach unfamiliarity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamecR.E. & Stark-AdamecC. (1986). Limbic hyperfunction. limbic epilepsy, and interictal behavior. InDoaneB.K. & LivingstonK.E., (Eds.), The limbic systemIpp.129–145). New York: Raven.
2.
ClarkeA.S.MasonW-A. & MobergG.P. (1988), Differential behavioral and adrenocortical responses to stress among three macaque species. American Journal of Primatology, 14, 37–52.
3.
de LanerolleN.C. & LangF.F. (1988). Functional neural pathways for vocalization in the domestic cat. InNewmanJ.D., (Ed.), The physiological control of mammalian vocalization (pp.21–42). New York: Plenum.
4.
DunnL.T. & EverittB.J. (1988). Double dissociations of the effects of amygdala and insular cortex lesions on condition taste aversion, passive avoidance and neophobia in the rat using the excitotoxin ibotenic acid. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 3–9.
5.
HindeR.A. & DennisA. (1986). Categorizing individuals: An alternative to linear analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 105–119.
6.
JurgensU. (1982). Amygdalar vocalization pathways in the squirrel monkey. Brain Research, 241, 189–196.
7.
KaganJ. (1989). Temperamental contributions to social behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 668–674.
8.
KaganJ. & MossJ. (1962). Birth to maturity. New York: Wiley (Reprinted by Yale university Press, New Haven, 1983).
9.
KaganJ.ReznickJ.S. & GibbonsJ. (1989). Inhibited and uninhibited types of children. Child Development, 60, 838–845.
KelleyA.E.DomesickV.B. & NautaW.J.H. (1982), The amygdalostriatal projection in the rat: An anatomical study by anterograde and retrograde tracing methods. Neuroscience, 7, 615–630.
12.
LaGasseL.GruberC. & LipsittL.P. (1989). The infantile expression of avidity in relation to later assessments. InReznickJ.S., (Ed.), Perspectives on behavioral inhibition (pp.159–176). Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
13.
MagnussonD. & AllenV.I. (1983), Human development: an interactional perspective. New York: Academic Press.
14.
MathenyA.P. (1989). Children's behavioral inhibition over age and across situations. Journal of Personality, 57, 215–235.
15.
MishkinM. & AggletonJ. (1981). Multiple functional contributions of the amygdala in the monkey. InBen-ArtY. (Ed.). The amygdala computer (pp409–420) INSERM Symposium 20. Elsevier North-Holland Biomedical Press.
16.
PriceJ.I.RusschenF.T. & AmaralD.G. (1987). The limbic region. II: The amygdaloid computer. InBiorklundA.HoldfellT.HoldfellT. & SwansonI. W., (Eds.)Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy integrated systems (Part 1Vol. 5) (pp.279–388). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17.
RosenbergA. & KaganJ. (1987). Iris pigmentation and behavioral inhibition. Development Psychobiology, 20, 377–392.
18.
SuomiS.J. (1987). Genetic and maternal contributions to individual differences in rhesus monkey biobehavioral development. InKrasnegorN.A.BlassE.M.HoferM.A. & SmothermanW.P., (Eds.), Prenatal development: A Psychobiological perspective (pp.397–420). New York; Academic Press.
19.
van den BoomD.C. (1989). Neonatal irritability and the development of attachmentInKohnstammG.A.BatesJ.E. & RothbartM. K. (Eds.). Temperament in childhood (pp.299–318). New York: Wiley.
