Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Observers viewed pairs of alternating photographs of a human body in different positions. Shortest-path motion solutions were pitted against anatomically possible movements. With short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), observers tended to report the shortest path despite violations of anatomical constraints. However, with longer SOAs observers became increasingly likely to report the anatomically possible, but longer, paths. This finding, in conjunction with those from a second study, challenges the accepted wisdom that apparent motion paths are independent of the object. Instead, our findings suggest that when given enough time and appropriate stimuli, the visual system prefers at least some object-appropriate apparent motion paths.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anstis

Ramachandran

(1985), Kinetic occlusion by apparent motion. Perception, 14, 145–149.

Berbaum

Lend

J.C.

(1983). Objects in the path of apparent motion. American Journal of Psychology, 96, 491–501.

Berbaum

Lenel

J.C

Rosenbaum

(1980). Dimensions of figural identity and apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1312–1317.

Bertenthal

B.I.

Proffitt DR. Cutting

J.E.

(1984). Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 37, 213–230.

Braddick

O.J.

(1980). Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 290, 137–151.

Burt

Sperling

(1981). Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological Review, 88, 171–195.

Farrell

Shepard

R.N.

(1981). Shape, orientation, and apparent rotational motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 477–486.

Freyd

(1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427–438.

Gerbino

(1984), Low-level and high-level processes in the perceptual organization of three-dimensional apparent motion. Perception, 13, 417–428.

10.

Johansson

(1975). Visual motion perception. Scientific American, 232, 76–88.

11.

Kolers

(1972) Aspects of motion perception. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

12.

Kolers

Pomerantz

(1971). Figural change in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 99–108.

13.

Korte

(1915) Kinematoskopische Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie, 72, 194–296.

14.

Pantle

Petersik

J.T.

(1980). Effects of spatial parameters on the perceptual organization of a bistable motion display. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 307–312.

15.

Shepard

R.N.

(1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417–447.

16.

Wertheimer

(1912). Experimentelle stuidien uber das Sehen von Beuegung. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie, 61, 161–265.

Apparent Motion of the Human Body

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References