Do citizens have a duty to abstain from voting when they cannot vote well? Jason Brennan has recently argued that, since citizens have a duty not to engage in harmful activities and bad voting is a harmful activity, citizens have a duty to abstain from voting badly. In this reply, I argue that Brennan dismisses the moral disagreements that unavoidably pervade the very idea of bad voting in a democratic society and provides a de-politicised and incomplete account of what voting badly means. Without a sound definition of bad voting, Brennan's argument fails.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellamyR. (2007), Political Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BrennanJ. (2009), ‘Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy87(4), pp. 535–549.
3.
BrennanJ. (2011), ‘The Right to a Competent Electorate’, Philosophical Quarterly61(245), pp. 700–724.
4.
BrettschneiderC. (2007), Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
HannaN. (2009), ‘An Argument for Voting Abstention’, Public Affairs Quarterly23(4), pp. 275–286.
6.
LeverA. (2007), ‘“A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting”: Some Reasons for Scepticism’, Politics28(1), pp. 61–64.
7.
MaritainJ. (1949), ‘Introduction’ in UNESCO (ed.), Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations, London and New York: Allan Wingate.
8.
SaundersB. (2009), ‘Increasing Turnout? A Compelling Case’, Politics30(1), pp. 70–77.
9.
WaldronJ. (1999), Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
