Post-apartheid South Africa has gone from being a good international citizen to defending a number of authoritarian regimes and obstructing various international initiatives aimed at strengthening the global human rights regime. This article presents this slide as a move from a ‘liberal’ foreign policy to a ‘liberationist’ one and emphasises the external sources of this shift, particularly the influence of the rest of Africa and a rising China.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldenC. (2007), China in Africa, London: Zed Books.
2.
AldenC. and Le PereG. (2004), ‘South Africa's Post-Apartheid Foreign Policy: From Reconciliation to Ambiguity?’, Review of African Political Economy31(100), pp. 283–297.
BarberJ. (2005), ‘The New South Africa's Foreign Policy: Principles and Practice’, International Affairs81(5), pp. 1079–1096.
5.
BlackD.R. (2003), ‘The New South Africa Confronts Abacha's Nigeria: The Politics of Human Rights in a Seminal Relationship’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics41(2), pp. 35–54.
ClaphamC. (1996), Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CornelissenS. (2006), ‘Displaced Multilateralism? South Africa's Participation at the United Nations: Disjunctures, Continuities and Contrasts’ in LeeD.TaylorI. and WilliamsP. (eds.), The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 26–50.
9.
CoxR.W. (1996), Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
EvansG. (1999), ‘South Africa's Foreign Policy after Mandela: Mbeki and his Concept of an African Renaissance’, Round Table88(352), pp. 621–628.
11.
HamillJ. (2006), ‘South Africa in Africa: The Dilemmas of Multilateralism’ in LeeD.TaylorI. and WilliamsP. (eds.), The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 118–140.
12.
HamillJ. and LeeD. (2001), ‘A Middle Power Paradox? South African Diplomacy in the Post-Apartheid Era’, International Relations15(4), pp. 33–59.
13.
JordaanE. (2007), ‘Grist for the Sceptic's Mill: Rwanda and the African Peer Review Mechanism’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies25(3), pp. 331–353.
14.
LeeD. (2006), ‘South Africa in the World Trade Organisation’ in LeeD.TaylorI. and WilliamsP. (eds.), The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 51–77.
15.
LeeD.TaylorI. and WilliamsP. (2006) (eds.), The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
MbekiT. (2002), ‘Critics Ill-Informed about NEPAD Peer Review’, ANC Today2(45), pp. 1–4.
19.
NelP.TaylorI. and Van der WesthuizenJ. (2001), ‘Reformist Initiatives and South Africa's Multilateral Diplomacy: A Framework for Understanding’ in NelP.TaylorI. and Van der WesthuizenJ. (eds.), South Africa's Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Change: The Limits of Reformism, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 1–30.
20.
TaylorI. (2005), NEPAD: Towards Africa's Development of Another False Start?, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
21.
TaylorI. and WilliamsP. (2006), ‘Introduction: Understanding South Africa's Multilateralism’ in LeeD.TaylorI. and WilliamsP. (eds.), The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–25.
22.
ValeP. and MasekoS. (1998), ‘South Africa and the African Renaissance’, International Affairs74(2), pp. 271–281.
23.
Van NieuwkerkA. (2006), ‘Foreign Policy-Making in South Africa: Context, Actors, and Process’ in CarlsnaesW. and NelP. (eds.), In Full Flight: South African Foreign Policy after Apartheid, Midrand: Institute for Global Dialogue, pp. 37–49.
