In the first sections of this article I give a simple and general account of critical discourse analysis (CDA) and how it might contribute to the theoretical and methodological repertoire of political studies through its discourse-dialectical theory of how discourse figures as an aspect of social practices without reducing those practices to discourse. In the final section I give a short illustrative example of how a CDA approach to detailed textual analysis might also be applied to specific texts (or groups of texts) in the political arena: in the example I take the press release in which the national UK government heralded its recent ‘empowerment’ White Paper, ‘Communities in Control’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BevirM. and RhodesR. (2004), ‘Interpreting British Governance’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations6(2), pp. 130–136.
2.
Communities and Local Government (2008) ‘White Paper Delivers Power Shift to Local People’, Press Release, London: Communities and Local Government, Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/corporate/886224, accessed 16 February 2010.
3.
DowdingK. (2004), ‘Interpretation, Truth and Investigation: Comments on Bevir and Rhodes’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations6(2), pp. 136–142.
4.
FaircloughN. (2003), Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, London: Routledge.
5.
FaircloughN. (2006), Language and Globalization, London: Routledge.
6.
FaircloughN.JessopR. and SayerA. (2002), ‘Critical Realism and Semiosis’, Journal of Critical Realism5(1), pp. 2–10.
7.
FarrellyM. (2008), ‘“Global” Discourses of Democracy and an English City’, Journal of Language and Politics7(3), pp. 413–430.
8.
FarrellyM. (forthcoming), Discourse and Democracy, London: Routledge.
9.
FinlaysonA. (2004), ‘Meaning and Politics: Assessing Bevir and Rhodes’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations6(2), pp. 149–156.
10.
HayC. (2004), ‘“Taking Ideas Seriously” in Explanatory Political Analysis’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations6(2), pp. 142–149.
11.
HayC. (2007) Why We Hate Politics.Cambridge: Polity.
12.
JessopB. (2004), ‘Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Economy’, Critical Discourse Studies1(2), pp. 159–174.
13.
JessopB. and SumN.-L. (2001), ‘Pre-disciplinary and Post-disciplinary Perspectives in Political Economy’, New Political Economy6(1), pp. 89–101.
14.
SayerA. (2000), Realism and Social Science, London: Sage.
15.
WodakR. (2009), The Discourse of Politics in Action, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
WodakR. and MeyerM. (eds.) (2001), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage.
