This article reviews the small literature on how to interview elites. It examines the veracity of three sets of assumptions embedded in the literature: about the nature of truth; dishonest respondents; and sophisticated but powerless researchers. It suggests ways forward, including ensuring that researchers place their work in more explicit philosophical and reflexive frameworks. This would result in more rigorous research and improved pedagogy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AberbachJ.D. and RockmanB.A. (2002), ‘Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews’, PS: Political Science & Politics35(4), pp. 673–676.
2.
AspinwallM. (2006), ‘Studying the British’, Politics26(1), pp. 3–10.
3.
BaileyP.H. and TilleyS. (2002), ‘Storytelling and the Interpretation of Meaning in Qualitative Research’, Journal of Advanced Nursing38(6), pp. 574–583.
4.
BallS.J. (1994), ‘Political Interviews and the Politics of Interviewing’, in WalfordG. (ed), Researching the Powerful in Education, London: UCL Press.
5.
BatesS.R. and JenkinsL. (2007), ‘Teaching and Learning Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science’, Politics27(1), pp. 55–63.
6.
BattesonC. and BallS.J. (1995), ‘Autobiographies and Interviews as Means of Access to Elite Policy-Making in Education’, British Journal of Educational Studies43(2), pp. 201–216.
7.
BeckerH.S. (1995), ‘How I Learned What a Crock Was’ in HertzI. and ImberJ.B. (eds.), Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, London: Sage.
8.
BerryM.J. (2002), ‘Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviews’, PS: Political Science & Politics35(4), pp. 679–682.
9.
BowlingA. (2002), Research Methods in Health, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
10.
BrymanA. (1998), Quantity and Quality in Social Research, London: Routledge.
11.
BrymanA. (2001), Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BurnhamP.GillandK.GrantW. and Layton-HenryZ. (2004), Research Methods in Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
BygnesS. (2008), ‘Interviewing People-Oriented Elites’, Eurosphere Online Working Paper Series, Bergen: University of Bergen.
14.
CohenL.ManionL. and MorrisonK. (2000), Research Methods in Education, Abingdon: Routledge.
15.
DaviesP.H.J. (2001), ‘Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services’, Politics21(1), pp. 73–80.
16.
DesmondM. (2004), ‘Methodological Challenges Posed in Studying an Elite in the Field’, Area36(3), pp. 262–269.
17.
DexterL.A. (1970), Elite and Specialized Interviewing, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
18.
FitzJ. and HalpinD. (1994), ‘Ministers and Mandarins: Educational Research in Elite Settings’ in WalfordG. (ed.), Researching the Powerful in Education, London: UCL Press.
19.
GoffmanE. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday.
20.
GoldsteinK. (2002), ‘Getting in the Door: Sampling and Completing Elite Interviews’, PS: Political Science & Politics35(4), pp. 669–672.
21.
GrixJ. (2002), ‘Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research’, Politics22(3), pp. 175–186.
22.
GrixJ. (2004), The Foundations of Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
GubaE.G. and LincolnY.S. (2005), ‘Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences’ in DenzinN.K. and LincolnY.S. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edn.), London: Sage.
24.
GustersonH. (1995), ‘Exploding Anthropology's Canon in the World of the Bomb: Ethnographic Writing on Militarism’ in HertzI. and ImberJ.B. (eds.), Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, London: Sage.
25.
HayC. (1997), ‘State of the Art: Divided by a Common Language: Political Theory and the Concept of Power’, Politics17(1), pp. 45–52.
26.
HerodA. (1999), ‘Reflections on Interviewing Foreign Elites: Praxis, Positionality, Validity, and the Cult of the Insider’, Geoforum30(4), pp. 313–327.
27.
HerzogH. (1995), ‘Research as a Communication Act: A Study of Israeli Women in Local Politics’ in HertzI. and ImberJ.B. (eds.), Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, London: Sage.
28.
HoldenJ.D. (2001), ‘Hawthorne Effects and Research into Professional Practice’, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice7(1), pp. 65–70.
29.
HolsteinJ.A. and GubriumJ.F. (1995), The Active Interview, London: Sage.
30.
HomanR. (1991), The Ethics of Social Research, London: Longman.
31.
HunterA. (1995), ‘Local Knowledge and Local Power: Notes on the Ethnography of Local Community Elites’ in HertzI. and ImberJ.B. (eds.), Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, London: Sage.
32.
KezarA. (2003), ‘Transformational Elite Interviews: Principles and Problems’, Qualitative Inquiry9(3), pp. 395–415.
33.
KingN. (2004), ‘Using Interviews in Qualitative Research’ in CassellC. and SymonG. (eds.), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, London: Sage.
34.
KoganM. (1994), ‘Researching the Powerful in Education and Elsewhere’ in WalfordG. (ed.), Researching the Powerful in Education, London: UCL Press.
35.
KuperA.LingardL. and LevinsonW. (2008), ‘Critically Appraising Qualitative Research’, British Medical Journal337, pp. 687–689.
36.
LeechB.L. (2002), ‘Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews’, PS: Political Science & Politics35(4), pp. 665–668.
37.
LillekerD.G. (2003), ‘Interviewing the Political Elite: Navigating a Potential Minefield’, Politics23(3), pp. 207–214.
38.
LloydJ. (1989), Black Adder IV, Episode 5 General Hospital, London: British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).
39.
MishlerE.G. (1986), Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
40.
MurphyE.DingwallR.GreatbatchD.ParkerS. and WatsonP. (1998), ‘Qualitative Research Methods in Health Technology Assessment: A Review of the Literature’, Health Technology Assessment2(16), pp. iii–ix, 1–274.
41.
OakleyA. (1981), ‘Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’ in RobetsH. (ed.), Doing Feminist Research, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
42.
OstranderS.A. (1995), ‘“Surely You're Not in This to Be Helpful?” Access, Rapport, and Interviews in Three Studies of Elites’ in HertzI. and ImberJ.B. (eds.), Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, London: Sage.
43.
PhillipsR. (1998), ‘The Politics of History: Some Methodological and Ethical Dilemmas in Elite-Based Research’, British Educational Research Journal24(1), pp. 5–19.
44.
PollittC.HarrisonS.HunterD. and MarnochG. (1990), ‘No Hiding Place: The Discomforts of Researching the Contemporary Policy Process’, Journal of Social Policy19(2), pp. 169–190.
45.
PopeC. and MaysN. (2000a), Qualitative Methods in Health Care, London: BMJ Books.
46.
PopeC. and MaysN. (2000b), ‘Quality in Qualitative Health Research’ in PopeC. and MaysN. (eds.), Qualitative Methods in Health Care, London: BMJ Books.
47.
RichardsD. (1996), ‘Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls’, Politics16(3), pp. 199–204.
48.
SabotE.C. (1999), ‘Dr Jekyl, Mr H(I)De: The Contrasting Face of Elites at Interview’, Geoforum30(4), pp. 329–335.
49.
SarantakosS. (2005), Social Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
SaundersP. (1983), Urban Politics: A Sociological Interpretation, London: Hutchinson.
51.
SaundersM.ThornhillA. and LewisP. (2006), Research Methods for Business Students, London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
52.
SmithK.E. (2006), ‘Problematising Power Relations in “Elite” Interviews’, Geoforum37(4), pp. 643–653.
53.
WalfordG. (1994), ‘Reflections on Researching the Powerful’ in WalfordG. (ed.), Researching the Powerful in Education, London: UCL Press.
54.
WoliverL.R. (2002), ‘Ethical Dilemmas in Personal Interviewing’, PS: Political Science & Politics35(4), pp. 677–678.
