The policy brief is an innovative and underutilised form of teaching, learning and assessment which provides undergraduate students with practical skills that translate directly into the workplace. This alternative to standard essays also challenges students to expand their research, writing and presentation skills. Further pedagogical advantages include assisting students in building personal development portfolios, improving internship programmes and making it difficult to plagiarise. International relations and political science curricula in the UK would benefit from the wider use of this tool.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiadisS. (2006), ‘Understanding Corporate Lobbying on its Own Terms’, ICCSR Research Paper Series, No. 42.
2.
AndrettaS. (2006), ‘Information Literacy: The New “Pedagogy of the Question”’ in WaltonG. and PopeA. (eds.), Information Literacy: Recognising the Need, Oxford: Chandos.
3.
AndrewC. (1995), For the President's Eyes Only: Secret Intelligence and the American Presidency from Washington to Bush, London: Harper Collins.
4.
BatesS.R. and JenkinsL. (2007), ‘Teaching and Learning Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science’, Politics27(1), pp. 55–63.
5.
BrzezinskiZ. (1983), Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Advisor 1977–81, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
6.
BurowP.ChallaC.DatlaK.DuGoffE.EliasJ.GreenfieldN.HalletE.NelbR. and RodriguezE. (eds.) (2007), 25 Ideas for Solving the Energy Crisis, Washington, DC: The Roosevelt Institution.
7.
CurtisS.AxfordB.BlairA.GibsonC.HugginsR. and SherringtonP. (2009), ‘Making Short Political Placements Work’, Politics29(1), pp. 62–70.
8.
DearingR. (1997), Higher Education in the Learning Society: The Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Hayes: NCIHE Publications.
MillerC. (1990), Lobbying: Understanding and Influencing the Corridors of Power (2nd edn.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
11.
MoirJ.Di DomenicoC.VertigansS. and SuttonP. (2008), ‘Perceptions of Personal Development Planning in Sociology and Social Science: The Scottish Higher Education Context’, Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences1(2), pp. 1–39.
RAIUL/OUVS (2008), Annual Programme Evaluation 2007/2008: Social Sciences (with Combined Studies), London: Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communications, Richmond, the American International University in London (RAIUL)/Open University Validation Services (OUVS).
17.
SinghR. (2001), ‘Teaching American Politics’, Politics21(2), pp. 130–136.
18.
StoneD.MaxwellS. and KeatingM. (2001), ‘Bridging Research and Policy’, Background Paper for the Bridging Research and Policy Workshop, 16–17 July 2001, jointly convened by the Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation and the Overseas Development Institute, University of Warwick. Available via the Global Development Network website at: http://www.richmond.ac.uk/resources/library/Subject_Resources/Politics/Policy_briefs/Policy_briefs.asp, accessed 15 July 2009.
