In this article we offer a potential research agenda for the study of popular culture in IR and outline how this research agenda could be advanced. If the incorporation of popular culture into IR is going to be fruitful, there must be a willingness to go beyond an engagement with illustrations of world politics. Doing so will get us closer to what is at stake in the mutual implication of popular culture and world politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdornoT. and HorkheimerM. (1997 [1944]), Dialectic of Enlightenment, London: Verso.
2.
AllisonA. (2006), Millennial Monsters: Japanese Toys and the Global Imagination, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
AlthusserL. (2001), Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, New York: Monthly Review Press.
4.
AppaduraiA. (1996), Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
AshleyR.K. and WalkerR.B.J. (1990), ‘Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly34(3), pp. 367–416.
BaudrillardJ. (1994), Simulacra and Simulation, trans. GlaserS.F., Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
9.
BleikerR. and HutchisonE. (2008), ‘Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics’, Review of International Studies34, 115–135.
10.
BoggsC. and PollardT. (2008), ‘The Imperial Warrior in Hollywood: Rambo and Beyond’, New Political Science30(4), pp. 565–578.
11.
BronfenE. (2006), ‘Reality Check: Image Affects and Cultural Memory’, Differences17(1), pp. 20–46.
12.
CampbellD. (1996), ‘Political Prosaics: Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World’ in ShapiroM.J. and AlkerH.R. (eds.), Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows and Territorial Identities, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 7–32.
13.
CornerJ. and PelsD. (eds.) (2003), Media and the Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity, and Cynicism, London: Sage.
14.
CrothersL. (2007), Globalization and American Popular Culture, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
DaviesM. (2005), ‘“Do It Yourself”: Punk Rock and the Disalienation of International Relations’ in FranklinM.I. (ed.), Resounding International Relations: On Music, Culture, and Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
16.
DebrixF. (2008), Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics, London: Routledge.
17.
Der DerianJ. (2001), Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
DittmerJ. and DoddsK. (2008) ‘Popular Geopolitics Past and Future: Fandom, Identities, and Audiences’, Geopolitics13(3), pp. 437–457.
19.
DoddsK. (2006), ‘Popular Geopolitics and Audience Dispositions: James Bond and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb)’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31(2), pp. 116–130.
20.
DoddsK. (2008), ‘Screening Terror: Hollywood, the United States and the Construction of Danger’, Critical Studies on Terrorism1(2), pp. 227–243.
21.
DorfmanA. and MattelartA. (1975), How to Read Donald Duck: Imperialist Ideology in the Disney Comic, New York: International General.
22.
EagletonT. (2005), The Function of Criticism, London: Verso.
23.
EdkinsJ. (2002), ‘Forget Trauma? Responses to September 11’, International Relations16(2), pp. 243–256.
24.
FranklinM.I. (ed.) (2005), Resounding International Relations: On Music, Culture, and Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
GeorgeJ. and CampbellD. (1990), ‘Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly34, pp. 269–293.
26.
GraysonK. (2008), Chasing Dragons: Security, Identity, and Illicit Drugs in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27.
GreggR.W. (1998), International Relations on Film, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
28.
HallS. (1980), ‘Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms’, Media, Culture, and Society2(1), pp. 57–72.
29.
HalterE. (2006), From Sun Tzu to Xbox: War and Video Games, New York: Perseus Publishing.
30.
HarveyD. (1989), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
HutchisonE. and BleikerR. (2008), ‘Emotional Reconciliation: Reconstituting Identity and Community after Trauma’, European Journal of Social Theory11(3), pp. 385–403.
33.
JonesJ.P. (2004), Entertaining Politics: New Political Television and Civic Culture, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
LaclauE. (1979), Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory, London: Verso.
35.
LaMarreH.L.LandrevilleK.D. and BeamM.A. (2009), ‘The Irony of Satire: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in the Colbert Report’, The International Journal of Press/Politics14(2), pp. 212–231.
36.
LyotardJ.F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
MarezC. (2004), Drug Wars: The Political Economy of Narcotics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
39.
MarshallP.D. (1997), Celebrity and Power: Fame in Contemporary Culture, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
NexonD.H. and NeumannI.B. (eds.) (2006), Harry Potter and International Relations, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
41.
O'TuathailG. (1996), Critical Geopolitics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
PhilpottS. and MutimerD. (2005), ‘Inscribing the American Body Politic: Martin Sheen and Two American Decades’, Geopolitics10(2), pp. 335–355.
43.
PosterM. (1995), The Second Media Age, Oxford: Polity Press.
44.
PosterM. (1997), Cultural History and Postmodernity: Disciplinary Readings and Challenges, New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
PosterM. (2000), The Information Subject, London: Routledge.
46.
PosterM. (2001), Information Please: Culture and Politics in the Age of Digital Machines, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
PowerM. (2007), ‘Digitized Virtuosity: Video War Games and Post 9/11 Cyber-Deterrence’, Security Dialogue38(2), pp. 271–288.
48.
ReichmuthP. and WerningS. (2006), ‘Pixel Pashas, Digital Djinns’, ISIM Review18(Autumn), pp. 46–47.
49.
RoumaniR. (2006), ‘Muslims Craft their Own Video Games’, Christian Science Monitor, 5 June.
50.
RuaneA. and JamesP. (2008), ‘The International Relations of Middle Earth: Learning from the Lord of the Rings’, International Studies Perspectives9(4), pp. 377–394.
51.
SaidE. (1981), Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World, London: Routledge.
52.
SandsP. (2008), Deception, Cruelty and the Compromise of Law, London: Allen Lane.
53.
ShaheenJ.G. (2008), Guilty: Hollywood's Verdict on Arabs after 9/11, Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press.
54.
ShapiroM.J. (1997), Violent Cartographies: Mapping Cultures of War, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
55.
ShapiroM.J. (1999), Cinematic Political Thought: Narrating Race, Nation and Gender, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
56.
ShapiroM.J. (2004), Methods and Nations: Cultural Governance and the Indigenous Subject, London: Routledge.
SislerV. (2008), ‘Digital Arabs’, European Journal of Cultural Studies11(2), pp. 203–220.
59.
StoreyJ. (2006), Culture Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction, Harlow: Pearson Education.
60.
StreetJ. (2004), ‘Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations6(4), pp. 435–452.
61.
TaylorM. (2003), The Vietnam War in History, Literature, and Film, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.