Since coming to power in 2002, China's ‘fourth generation’ leadership has attempted to steer the country on to a new development path that emphasises environmental protection and resource conservation. This article argues that this has opened up a window of opportunity for China's State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA), long perceived as a weak body, to expand its influence and improve implementation of environmental policies. This article examines two recent SEPA initiatives, green GDP and so-called ‘environmental storms’, to see to what extent SEPA has been able to achieve these outcomes. It concludes that, although the profile of environmental issues has risen as a result of these two initiatives, they also highlight the difficulties inherent in enforcing better environmental standards in an authoritarian political system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
21 Shiji Jingji Baodao (2007a), ‘Huanbao Zongju Dongyong Quyu Xianpi Tieling Si Da Dianli Huiying Zhenggai (SEPA Resorts to Regional Restriction to Order Four Major Electric Power Corporations to Answer to Reform and Consolidation)’, 13 January. Available at: http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2007-01-13/003112023721.shtml, accessed 16 January 2007.
2.
21 Shiji Jingji Baodao (2007b), ‘Zhongguo Huanbao Fangxian Gaoji – Huanbao Zongju Shouci Qidong Quyu Xianpi (China's Environmental Protection Defence Reports Emergency – SEPA Initiates Regional Permit Restrictions for the First Time)’, 13 January. Available at: http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2007-01-13/003112023401.shtml, accessed 16 January 2007.
3.
AdamsP. (2005), ‘Environmental NGOs in China: Encouraging Action and Addressing Public Grievances’, Statement to Congressional-Executive Commission on China, 7 February.
EconomyE.C. (2004), The River Runs Black: The Environmental Challenge to China's Future, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
EdinM. (2003), ‘Remaking the Communist Party-State: The Cadre Responsibility System at the Local Level in China’, China: An International Journal1(1), pp. 1–15.
8.
FewsmithJ. (2004), ‘Promoting the Scientific Development Concept’, China Leadership Monitor, 11.
LieberthalK. (1992), ‘Introduction: The “Fragmented Authoritarian” Model And Its Limitations’ in LieberthalK. and LamptonD. (eds.), Bureaucracy, Politics and Decision Making in Post-Mao China, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 1–30.
14.
LieberthalK. (1997), ‘China's Governing System and Its Impact on Environmental Policy Implementation’, China Environmental Series, 1, pp. 3–8.
PanY. (2004a), ‘Jianli Lüse GDP Tixi Shi Kexue Fazhan Guan De Zhongda Shijian (Establishing a System of Green GDP is a Major Way of Putting the Scientific Development Concept Into Practice)’, Speech, June. Available at: http://www.gdepb.gov.cn/hjgl/lsgdp/ldjh/t20051011_3332.htm, accessed 30 July 2007.
19.
PanY. (2004b), ‘Lüse GDP: Jidai Kuayue Liang Da Zhang'ai (Green GDP: Urgently Waiting to Overcome Two Large Obstacles)’, People's Daily, 8 April. Available at: http://www.people.com.cn/GB/huanbao/2436338.html, accessed 28 November 2006.
20.
PayneR.A. (1995), ‘Freedom and the Environment’, Journal of Democracy6(3), pp. 41–55.
Van RooijB. (2006), ‘Implementation of Chinese Environmental Law: Regular Enforcement and Political Campaigns’, Development and Change34(1), pp. 57–74.
24.
SEPA (2006), ‘Huanbao Zongju Guojia Tongji Ju Fabu Lüse Guomin Jingji Hesuan Yanjiu Chengguo (Environmental Protection Administration and National Bureau of Statistics Publish the Fruits of Their Research into the Calculation of Green Gross Domestic Product)’, News Release No. 65, 7 September. Available at: http://www.sepa.gov.cn/xcjy/zwhb/200609/t20060907_92529/htm, accessed 9 September 2006.
25.
ShiJ. (2006), ‘Green GDP Stays on Agenda of Environmental Watchdog’, South China Morning Post, 26 May. Available at: http://www.scmp.com, accessed 24 July 2007.
26.
ShiJ. (2007), ‘Faith in Green GDP Idea Lost Amid the Bickering’, South China Morning Post, 24 July. Available at: http://www.scmp.com, accessed 24 July 2007.
WinslowM. (2005), ‘Is Democracy Good for the Environment?’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management48(5), pp. 771–783.
30.
Xinhua News Agency (2007), ‘Huanbao Zongju Fu Juzhang Pan Yue: Lüse GDP Xiangmu Bu Hui Ting (SEPA Vice-Minister Pan Yue: The Green GDP Project Will Not Stop)’, 13 January. Available at: http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2007-01/13/content_5600553.htm, accessed 10 April 2007.
31.
YangL. (2007a), ‘Environmental Crackdown Targets China's Most Powerful Polluters’, Worldwatch Institute, 18 January. Available at: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4863/print, accessed 5 April 2007.
32.
YangL. (2007b), ‘2005 Lüse GDP Shuju Nanchan – Duiwai Fabu Reng Wu Mingque Shijian Biao (2005 Green GDP Data Overdue – Still No Clear Timetable for Publication)’, 21 Shiji Jingji Baogao, 22 March. Available at: http://env.people.com.cn/GB/5499387.html, accessed 11 April 2007.
33.
ZhangC. and HeQ. (2007), ‘2005 Lüse GDP Baogao Nanchan – Wuran Sunshi Chao 2004 Nian (2005 Green GDP Report Overdue – Pollution Losses Exceed 2004)’, Jingji Guancha Wang, 27 March. Available at: http://www.eeo.com.cn/eeo/jjgcb/news/2007/03/27/51666.html, accessed 6 April 2007.
34.
ZhengY. and ChenM. (2006), ‘China Promotes Green GDP for More Balanced Development’, Briefing SeriesIssue 16, The University of Nottingham China Policy Institute, December 2006.
