Ever since ancient Greece, philosophers have assumed the existence of a public interest that is more than the sum of the interests of the individuals that make up a polity. However, the utilitarians and more recently the theorists of the ‘New Right’ have argued that the public interest consists simply of individual interests summed together, with the result that the related notion that public servants have a special duty to protect and promote the collective public interest has been subjected to sustained attack. However, the collective public interest remains in the form of four values that public servants are required to promote: accountability, legality, integrity and responsiveness. In consequence, public sector management is essentially different from business management and can only be subsumed within the latter to a limited extent when considering the education pf public servants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle (1962), The Politics, ed. with an introduction by SinclairT.A., London: Penguin Books.
2.
BenthamJ. (1776), Fragment on Government, London: Bentham.
3.
BenthamJ. (1789), The Theory of Morals and Legislation, London: Bentham.
4.
BerkiR. (1979), ‘State and Society: An Antithesis of Modern Political Thought’ in HaywardJ.E.S. and BerkiR.N. (eds.), State and Society in Contemporary Europe, Oxford: Oxford Martin Robertson, pp. 1–20.
5.
CarmichaelP. (2004a), ‘The Crisis in Public Administration’, PSA News15, pp. 6–7.
6.
CarmichaelP. (2004b), ‘Shackled to a Corpse? A reply to Howard Elcock’, Public Policy & Administration19, pp. 8–12.
7.
ChapmanB. (1959), The Profession of Government: The Public Service in Europe, London: G. Allen & Unwin.
8.
ChapmanR. (1988), The Art of Darkness, Inaugural Lecture, University of Durham.
9.
DownsA. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.
10.
ElcockH. (1998), ‘The Changing Problem of Accountability in Modern Government: An Analytical Agenda for Reformers’, Public Policy and Administration13, pp. 23–37.
11.
ElcockH. (2004), ‘Public Administration: Why Are We in the Mess We're in?’, Public Policy & Administration19(2), pp. 3–7.
12.
ElcockH. (2005), ‘Public Administration: British Art versus European Technocracy’, Public Money and Management25, pp. 75–81.
13.
FriedmanM. and FriedmanR. (1980), Free to Choose, London: Penguin Books.
14.
FryG.K. (1969), Statesmen in Disguise, London: Macmillan.
15.
GoldsmithM. (2004), ‘The Future of Public Administration – and of Political Science in Europe’, PSA News15, p. 5.
16.
von HayekF. (1944), The Road to Serfdom, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
17.
HobbesT. (1962), Leviathan, ed. with an introduction by PlamenatzJohn, London: Fontana Books.
18.
HoodC. (1991), ‘A Public Management for all Seasons’, Public Administration69, pp. 3–19.
19.
JordanA.G. (2004), ‘Public Administration's Little Local Difficulty: A Comment on Dr. Carmichael's Prescription’, PSA News15, pp. 3–4.
20.
LeninV.I. (1961), ‘What is to be Done?’ in WishartL. (ed.), Collected Works of V.I. Lenin, Volume 5, London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 347–529.
21.
LeninV.I. (1978), ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Backwards’ in WishartL. (ed.), Collected Works, Volume 7, London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 203–425.
22.
LockeJ. (1960), ‘Second Treatise on Government’ in BarkerE. (ed.), Social Contract: Locke, Hume, Rousseau, London: Oxford University Press.
23.
MakrydimitrisA. (2002), ‘Dealing with Ethical Dilemmas in Public Administration: The “ALIR” Imperatives of Ethical Reasoning’, International Review of Administrative Sciences68, pp. 251–266.
24.
MillJ.S. (1861), Considerations on Representative Government, London: Bentham.
25.
MillJ.S. (1961), ‘Essay on Liberty’ in The Essential Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. with introduction by LernerMax, London: Bantam Classics.
26.
MonbiotG. (2004), ‘Puritanism for the Rich,’The Guardian, 9 November.
27.
NiskanenW.A. (1973), Bureaucracy: Servant or Master?Chicago: IEA.
28.
Nolan Committee (1995), First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Cm 2850–1, London: The Stationery Office.
29.
OakeshottM. (1962), Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London: Methuen.
30.
O'TooleB. (1996), ‘The Concept of Public Duty’ in BarberisP., (ed.), The Civil Service in an Era of Change, London: Dartmouth Press, pp. 82–94.
31.
PerryJ.L. and KraemerK.L. (1983), Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives, New York: May-field Publishing.
32.
Plato, (1964), The Republic, ed. and trans. LeeH.D.P., London: Penguin Books.
33.
PollittC. (1985), ‘Performance Measurement in the Longer Term’, Public Money and Management9, pp. 51–55.
34.
PollittC. (1990), Managerialism and the Public Services, Oxford: Blackwell.
35.
RiccardoD. (1819), The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: Bentham.
36.
SmithA. (1776), The Wealth of Nations, London: Bentham.
37.
StewartJ.D. (1983), Local Government: The Conditions of Local Choice, London: Allen & Unwin.
38.
RousseauJ.J. (1960), ‘The Social Contract (Du Contrat Social)’ in BarkerE. (ed.), Social Contract: Locke, Hume, Rousseau, London: Oxford University Press.
39.
TawneyR.H. (1936), Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: A Historical Study, London: John Murray.
40.
TerryF. (2003), ‘Public Management: Time for a Re-Launch’, Public Policy & Management Association Review23, pp. 1–3.
41.
Thucydides (1954), History of the Pelopponesian War, ed. FinleyM.I., trans. WarnerR., London: Penguin Books.
42.
WaldegraveW. (1993), The Realily of Reform and Accountability in Today's Public Services, London: Public Finance Foundation.
