‘Interdisciplinarity’ is an ancient notion in the social sciences, but has acquired both pedagogic and policy popularity in recent decades. Paradoxically, it only makes sense in a disciplinary world. The disciplines have been greatly strengthened in recent decades, and interdisciplinarity can partly be understood as a response by interests threatened by disciplinarity. It is also a strategy used by disciplines in crisis, and by dissidents from disciplinary hierarchies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Economic and Social Research Council (2005), Annual Report and Accounts, HC 92, 2004–5.
2.
ChapmanB. and PotterA. (eds.) (1974), WJMM, Political Questions: Essays in Honour of W.J.M. Mackenzie, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
3.
GoodinR. and KlingemannH.-D. (eds.) (1995), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
HaywardJBarryB. and BrownA. (eds.) (2003), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE) (2003), Review of Research Assessment: Report by Sir Gareth Roberts to the UK Funding Bodies, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council.
6.
Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE) (2004), RAE2008: Initial Decisions by the UK Funding Bodies, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council.
7.
Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE) (2005), RAE 2008: Guidance on Submissions, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council.
8.
MackenzieW.J.M. (1967), Politics and Social Science, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
9.
MarshD. and SavignyH. (2004), ‘Political Science as a Broach Church’, Politics24, pp. 155–168.
10.
MoranJ. (1998), ‘Cultural Studies and Academic Stardom’, International Journal of Cultural Studies1, pp. 67–82.
11.
MoranJ. (2002), Interdisciplinarity: The New Critical Idiom, London: Routledge.
12.
SlomanA. (1964), A University in the Making, London: British Broadcasting Corporation.
