Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The problem of over population has been the subject of much debate since Malthus's ‘Essay on the Principle of Population’ in 1798. This debate has taken on a new sense of urgency, however, during the last 25 years, as the global implications of rapid population growth have became apparent. Attempts by the international community to establish a regime to deal with the problem have led to the convening of three conferences, Bucharest (1974), Mexico City (1984) and Cairo (1994). But despite propitious signs of consensus during the run up periods to each of these conferences, no international regime has been created This article examines the reasons for both the initial consensus and the eventual dissensus in each case, and concludes that several pre-conditions must be met if a regime is to be established in the future.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boserup

(1965), The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. London: Allen & Unwin.

Camp

S.L.

(1993), ‘Population: The Critical Decade.’ Foreign Policy, 90, pp. 126–144.

Cordahi

(1994), ‘Big Issues Slip Past Religious Filibusters.’ The Guardian, 14 September, p.10.

Crane

B.B.

(1993), ‘International Population Institutions: Adapting to a Changing World Order’ in Haas

P.M.

(1993) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Co-operation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

The Economist (1994), ‘Al Azhar Joins the Vatican.’ 27 September, p.44.

Ehrlich

(1975), The Population Bomb. River City, Mass.: River City Press.

Finkle

J.L.

Crane

B.B.

(1985), ‘Ideology and Politics at Mexico City.’ Population and Development Review, 11(1), pp. 1–23.

Haggard

Simmons

B.A.

(1987), ‘Theories of International Regimes.’ International Organization, 41(3), pp. 491–517.

Harrison

(1993), The Third Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

10.

Harrison

(1994), ‘Not Just a Numbers Game.’ Our Planet, 6(3), pp.5–7.

11.

Johnson

S.P.

(1987), World Population and the United Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Keohane

R.O.

(1984), After Hegemony: Co-operation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

13.

Krasner

S.D.

(1983), International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

14.

Meadows

(1972), The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.

15.

Macura

(1986), ‘The Significance of the United Nations International Population Conferences.’ Population Bulletin of the United Nations, 19/20, pp.20–24.

16.

Myers

(1993), Ultimate Security. London: W.W. Norton.

17.

Porritt

(1994), ‘Maternity Benefit?’ The Times Higher Education Supplement, 2 September.

18.

Schoon

(1994), ‘Vatican Enters Spirit of Give and Take.’ The Independent, 14 September.

19.

Teitelbaum

M.S.

(1992), ‘The Population Threat.’ Foreign Affairs, Winter, 71, pp.63–78.

20.

Tolba

M.K.

(1992), The World Environment 1972–1992. London: Chapman and Hall.

21.

Young

O.R.

(1989), ‘The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment.’ International Organization, 43(3), pp.349–375.

22.

Young

O.R.

(1990), ‘Global Environmental Change and International Governance’ in Rowlands, I.H. and Greene, M. (1990) Global Environmental Change and International Relations. London: Macmillan.

An International Environmental Regime for Population?: From Bucharest to Cairo

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References