The disagreement within the European Union (EU) concerning the system of qualified majority voting highlighted the inequalities within the present allocation of votes. With enlargement these inequalities are likely to intensify. We suggest that the EU should examine alternative methods for the allocation of Council votes. Two possible scenarios are allocation according to population size, and second, allocation based upon contributions to the EU budget. We conclude that either of these methods would offer a greater degree of equity, stability and flexibility in the decision-making process of the European Council.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Economist Intelligence Unit (1994), Country Reports -First Quarter 1994. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
2.
European Communities (1993), Court of Auditors Report 1992. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
3.
NorthcottJ. (1991), Britain in 2010. London: Policy Studies Institute.
4.
TeasdaleA. (1993), ‘The Life and Death of the Luxembourg Compromise’, Journal of Common Market Studies31(4).
5.
WallaceW. (1992), ‘From Twelve to Twenty-Four? The Challenges to the EC Posed by the Revolutions in Eastern Europe’, in CrouchC.MarquandD. (eds.) Towards a Greater Europe? A Continent Without an Iron Curtain. London: The Political Quarterly/Blackwell.
