AbrahamH J, (1974; 2nd ed.1984), Justices and Presidents: A Political History of Appointments to the Suprem Court (New York, Oxford University Press).
2.
AtkinsBTaggartW, (1982), ‘Substantive Access Doctrines and Conflict Management in the US Supreme Court: Reflections on Activism and Restraint’, in HalpernSLambC M, (eds), Supreme Court Activism and Restraint (Lexington, Mass., Heath).
3.
BannanJ F R S, (1974), Law, Morality and Vietnam: The Peace Militants and the Courts (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).
4.
BeckerTFeeleyM, (eds) (1969, 1973), The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions (New York, Oxford University Press).
5.
BlasiV, (ed) (1983), The Burger Court: The Counter-Revolution That Wasn't (New Haven, Yale University Press).
6.
CaldeiraG A, (1981), ‘The United States Supreme Court and Criminal Cases, 1935–1976: Alternative Models of Agenda Building’, British Journal of Political Science, 11, pp 449–70.
7.
CasperGPosnerR N, (1974), ‘A Study of the Supreme Court's Caseload’, Journal of Legal Studies, 3, pp 339–76.
8.
ChoperJ, (1980), The Supreme Court and the National Political Process (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
9.
DanelskiD J, (1964), A Supreme Court Justice is Appointed (New York, Random House).
10.
DanelskiD J, (1982–3), ‘Brandeis and Frankfurter: Book Review’, Harvard Law Review, 96, pp 312–30.
11.
DouglasW O, (1980), The Court Years, 1939–1975 (New York, Random House).
12.
DunneG T, (1977), Hugo Black and the Judicial Revolution (New York, Simon and Schuster).
13.
ElyJ H, (1980), Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).
14.
Federal Judicial Center (1972), Report of the Study Group on the Caseload of the Supreme Court (Washington, Federal Judicial Center).
15.
FriendlyF WElliottM J H, (1984), The Constitution: That Delicate Balance (New York, Random House).
16.
GarrattyJ A, (ed) (1964), Quarrels that have Shaped the Constitution (New York, Harper and Row).
17.
GragliaL A, (1976), Disaster by Decree: The Supreme Court's Decisions on Race in Schools (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
18.
GrossmanJ BWasbyS L, (1972), ‘The Senate and Supreme Court Nominations: Some Reflections’, Duke Law Journal, pp 557–91.
19.
HalpernS CLambC M, (eds) (1982), Supreme Court Activism and Restraint (Lexington, Mass., Heath).
20.
HarrisR, (1971), Decision (New York, Dutton).
21.
HirschH N, (1981), The Enigma of Felix Frankfurter (New York, Basic Books).
22.
Hodder-WilliamsR, (1976), ‘The Workload of the Supreme Court: A Comment on the Freund Report’, Journal of American Studies, 10, pp 215–39.
23.
Hodder-WilliamsR, (1980), An Introduction to the Politics of the US Supreme Court (London, Allen and Unwin).
24.
Hodder-WilliamsR, (1985), ‘The Burger Court and the Executive Branch’ (unpublished paper, Western Political Science Association Conference, Las Vegas, March 1985).
25.
HoganJ, (1974), The Schools, the Courts, and the Public Interest (Lexington, Mass., Heath).
26.
HorowitzD, (1977), The Courts and Social Policy (Washington DC, Brookings Inst.) Johnson, C A (1979), ‘Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions: A Quantitative Examination’, American Journal of Political Science, 23, pp 792–804.
27.
KlugerR, (1976), Simple Justice (New York: Vintage).
28.
LewisG A, (1980), New York Review of Books, 7 February 1980.
29.
LiebermanJ K, (1981), The Litigious Society (New York, Basic Books).
30.
MasonT A, (1980–81), ‘Eavesdropping on Justice: A Review Essay’, Pol itical Science Quarterly, 95, pp 295–304.
31.
MurphyW F, (1962), Congress and the Court (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
32.
MurphyB A, (1982), The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices (New York, Oxford University Press).
33.
NagelS S, (1965), ‘Court-curbing Periods in American History’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 18, pp 925–44.
34.
NavaskyV, (1971), Kennedy Justice (New York, Atheneum).
35.
Note (1983–84), ‘Of High Designs: A Compendium of Proposals to Reduce the Workload of the Supreme Court’, Harvard Law Review, 97, pp 307–25.
36.
O'ConnorK, (1980), Women's Organisations' Use of the Courts (Lexington, Mass., Heath).
37.
OrfieldG, (1978), Must We Bus? Segregated Schools and National Policy (Washington DC; Brookings Institution).
38.
PritchettC H, (1961), Congress Versus the Supreme Court (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).
39.
ProvineD M, (1980) Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
40.
RathjenG JSpaethH J, (1979), ‘Access to Federal Courts: An Analysis of Burger Court Policy Making’, American Journal of Political Science, 23, pp 360–82.
41.
RebellABlockA R, (1982), Educational Policy Making and the Courts (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
42.
SaratAGrossmanJ B, (1975), ‘Courts and Conflict Resolution: Problems in the Mobilization of Adjudication’, American Political Science Review, 69, pp 1200–17.
43.
SchwartzB, (1983), Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court - A Judicial Biography (New York, New York University Press).
44.
SchwartzBLesherS, (1983), Inside the Warren Court, 1953–1969 (Garden City, NY, Doubleday).
45.
SciglianoR, (1971), The Supreme Court and the Presidency (New York, Free Press).
46.
ShoganR, (1972), A Question of Judgement (Minneapolis, Ind., Bobbs Merrill).
47.
SimonJ F, (1980), Independent Journey: The Life of William 0 Douglas (New York, Harper and Row).
48.
SindlerA P, (1978), Bakke, De Funis, and Minority Admissions: The Quest for Equal Opportunity (New York, Longman).
49.
SlotnickE E, (1979), ‘Who Speaks for the Court? Majority Opinion Assignment from Taft to Burger’, American Journal of Political Science, 23, pp 60–77.
50.
SoraufF J, (1976), The Wall of Separation: The Constitutional Politics of Church and State (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
51.
TarrG A, (1977), Judicial Impact and State Supreme Courts (Lexington, Mass., Heath).
52.
UlmerS S, (1972), ‘The Decision to Grant Certiorari as an Indicator to Decision on the Merits’, Polity, 4, pp 439–47.
53.
UlmerS S, (1978), ‘Selecting Cases for Supreme Court Review: An Underdog Model’, American Political Science Review, 72, pp 902–10.
54.
UlmerS SKirkloskyLHintzeW, (1972), ‘The Decision to Grant or Deny Certiorari: Further Considerations of the Cue Theory’, Law and Society Review, 6, pp 637–43.
55.
VoseC E, (1958), ‘Litigation as a form of Pressure Group Activity’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 319, pp 20–31.
56.
WarrenE, (1977), The Memoirs of Chief Justice Earl Warren (New York, Doubleday).
57.
WasbyS L, (1970), The Impact of the United States Supreme Court (Homewood, Ill., Dorsey).
58.
WasbyS L, (1976), Small Town Police and the Supreme Court: Hearing the Word (Lexington, Mass., Heath).
59.
WhiteG E, (1982), Earl Warren: A Public Life (New York, Oxford University Press).
60.
WilkinsonJ H, (1979), From Brown to Bakke (New York, Oxford University Press).
61.
WoodwardBArmstrongS, (1979), The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court (New York: Simon and Schuster).