Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1976), Pragmatic Federalism: The Reassignment of Functional Responsibility. M-105 (Washington, D.C.: ACIR).
2.
AshfordD.E. (ed.) (1980), National Resources and Urban Policy (London: Methuen/Croom Helm).
3.
BresnickD. (1980), ‘New Roles for State Officials in an Age of Fiscal Federalism’, State Government, 53,2, pp.81–3.
4.
BurkheadJ. (1975), ‘The Political Economy of Urban America: National Urban Policy Revisited’, in GappertG.RoseH.M. (eds.), The Social Economy of Cities (Beverley Hills: Sage).
5.
CaraleyD. (1979), ‘Carter, Congress and the Cities’, in MarshallD.R. (ed.), Urban Policy Making (Beverley Hills: Sage).
6.
GappertG.RoseH.M. (1975), The Social Economy of Cities (Beverley Hills: Sage).
7.
HUD (1978), A New Partnership to Conserve America's Communities (Washington D.C.: Department of Housing and Urban Development).
8.
HuthM.J. (1980), ‘New Hope for the Revival of America's Central Cities’, in LaconteP. (ed.), ‘Changing Cities: A Challenge to Planning’, The Annals (of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 451).
9.
McKayD.H. (1980), ‘The Rise of the Topocratic State: US Intergovernmental Relations in the 1970s’, in AshfordD.E. (ed.), Financing Urban Government in the Welfare State (London: Croom Helm).
10.
MasottiL.H. (1979), ‘Toward a viable urban future in a society of limits: Possibilities, policies, and politics’, in MarshallD.R. (ed.), Urban Policy Making (Beverley Hills: Sage).
11.
ReussH.S. (1971), ‘To Save a City’, (Washington D.C.: Subcommittee on the City, of the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives. 95th Congress, First Session).
12.
SchickA. (1980), Congress and Money (Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute).
13.
StenbergC.W. (1980), ‘Federalism in Transition: 1959–79’, Intergovernmental Perspective (ACIR)6,1.
14.
TobinG.A. (ed.) (1979), The Changing Structure of the City (Beverley Hills: Sage).
15.
WrightD.S. (1978), Understanding Intergovernmental Relations, (North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury).