BarfieldClaude E. (1981), Rethinking Federalism: Block Grants and Federal, State, and Local Responsibilities (Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research).
2.
Conference on State Legislatures (1971), The Sometime Government: A Critical Study of the 50 American State Legislatures (New York: Bantam Books).
3.
CoulterPhilip (1980), ‘Measuring the Inequity of Urban Public Services: A Methodological Discussion with Application’, Policy Studies Journal, 8, pp.663–98.
4.
EasterbrookGreg (1982), ‘Fifty Miniature Washingtons’, Washington Monthly, January.
5.
GallupGeorge (1981), ‘Public is receptive to Reagan's New Federalism - Returning Power to States’, October 18.
6.
GarnettJames L. (1980), Reorganizing State Government: The Executive Branch (Boulder Colorado: Westview).
7.
KettlDonald F. (1981), ‘The Fourth Face of Federalism’, Public Administration Review, 41, pp.366–71.
8.
KirlingJohn J. (1979), ‘Adapting the Intergovernmental Fiscal System to the Demands of an Advanced Economy’ in TobinGary A. (ed.), The Changing Structure of the City: What happened to the Urban Crisis (Beverly Hills, California: Sage).
9.
LevineCharles H. (1979), ‘More on Cutback Management: Hard Questions for Hard Times’, Public Administration Review, 39, pp.179–83.
10.
LevineCharlesH. (1981), The Politics of Retrenchment: How Local Governments Manage Fiscal Stress (Beverly Hills, California: Sage).
11.
LevineCharles H.PosnerPaul (1979), ‘The Centralizing Effects of Austerity on the Intergovernmental System’, paper prepared for delivery at the 1979 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., Aug. 31-Sept. 3, 1979.
12.
LevyFrank (1974), Urban Outcomes (Berkeley, California: University of California Press).
13.
LineberryRobert L. (1977), Equality and Urban Policy: The Distribution of Municipal Public Services (Beverly Hills, California: Sage).
14.
MeltsnerArnold J. (1971), The Politics of City Revenue (Berkeley, California: University of California Press).
15.
NathanRichard P. (1981), ‘The Nationalization of Proposition 13’, P.S. 14, p.755.
16.
New York Times (1981a), ‘Study Finds Fiscal Condition of States is Deteriorating’, October 11, p.18.
17.
New York Times (1981b), ‘Minnesota Recalls Legislature of Money’, November 6, p.8; ‘Washington State Reeling as Both its Tax Revenues and Federal Aid Drop’, October 17, p.8; ‘Pennsylvanians Gird for Battle on Response to Reagan Budget and Tax Cuts’, October 23, p.13.
18.
New York Times (1981c), ‘St. Louis Struggles With Federal Cuts’ October 20, p. 8; ‘Reagan Budget Squeezing California’, October 27, p.11.
19.
New York Times (1981d), ‘U.S. Cities, in Fiscal Squeeze, Turn to Private Sector for Aid’, October 31, p.1.
20.
New York Times (1981e), ‘South's Poor to Suffer from Cuts’, October 12, p.14.
21.
New York Times (1981f), ‘Western States Seek New Levies as U.S. Cuts Threaten Variety of Projects’, November 5, p.13.
22.
SabatoLarry (1978), Goodbye to Good-Time Charlie: The American Governor Transformed, 1950–1975 (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath).
23.
SavasE.S. (1977), Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press).
24.
SchmondtHenry (1979), The Impact of Federal Aid on the City of St. Louis: A Case Study for the Brookings Institution (Washington D.C.: Report MEL 79–25 (1)).
25.
Thomas, John Clayton (1981), ‘The Class Impacts of Budget Cutbacks: Outcomes of Retrenchment in Cincinnati’, The Urban Interest, 3, 51–61.
26.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1978) ‘Federal Initiatives and Impacts’, Intergovernmental Perspective, 4, 9.
27.
U.S. Congress, House of Representatives (1981), Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, Vol. II, pp.672–81, 97th Congress, 1st session.
28.
U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee (1981), Trends in the Fiscal Condition of Cities: 1979–1981, 3–4, 97th Congress, 1st session (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office).
29.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1981), Additional Details on Budget Savings, pp.182–83.
30.
WolmanHarold (1980), ‘Local Government Strategies to Cope with Fiscal Pressure’, in LevineCharles H.IreneRubin (eds.), Fiscal Stress and Public Policy (Beverly Hills, California: Sage), pp.231–48.
31.
YinRobert (1980), ‘Creeping Federalism: The Federal Impact on the Structure and Function of Local Government’, in GlickmanNorman J. (ed.), The Urban Impacts of Federal Policies (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press), pp.595–618.