This article examines the emergence and politics of new modes of regional governance understood as a form of regulatory regionalism. Regulatory regionalism is defined in terms of the institutional spaces of regional regulation functioning within ostensibly national policy and political institutions. The central insight of this essay is that the politics of this regulatory regionalism can be conceptualised as a system of territorial politics fought out and accommodated across the institutional space of the state. The emphasis on territorial politics highlights the fact that strategic moves within institutional space are shaped by the political context in which the regional and ‘regionalising’ actors operate. From our perspective regulatory regionalism is a distinctive method of boundary control over overlapping political arenas, which brings into play a system of territorial politics within the state. We test this argument through an examination of regional governance in the Asia-Pacific region which is often thought of as being inhospitable to such governance innovation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcharyaA. (2007) ‘The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics’, World Politics, 59 (4), 629–52.
2.
AcharyaA. and StubbsR. (2006) ‘Theorizing Southeast Asian Relations: An Introduction’, The Pacific Review, 19 (2), 125–34.
3.
AradauC. and Van MunsterR. (2007) ‘Governing Terrorism through Risk: Taking Precautions, (Un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations, 13 (1), 89–115.
4.
ArnoldiJ. (2009) Risk.Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
BeckU. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London: Sage.
6.
BeckU. (1999) World Risk Society.Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BeckU. (2002) ‘The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited’, Theory, Culture and Society, 19 (4), 39–55.
8.
BeckU. (2009) World at Risk.Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
BeesonM. (2009) ‘Geopolitics and the Making of Regions: The Fall and Rise of East Asia’, Political Studies, 57 (3), 498–516.
10.
BellS. and ParkA. (2006) ‘The Problematic Metagovernance of Networks: Water Reform in New South Wales’, Journal of Public Policy, 26 (1), 63–83.
11.
BergerM. T. (2006) ‘From Nation-Building to State-Building: The Geopolitics of Development, the Nation-State System and the Changing Global Order’, Third World Quarterly, 27 (1), 5–25.
12.
Caballero-AnthonyM. (2008) ‘Non-traditional Security and Infectious Diseases in ASEAN: Going beyond the Rhetoric of Securitization to Deeper Institutionalization’, The Pacific Review, 21 (4), 507–25.
13.
Caballero-AnthonyM. (2009) ‘Evolving Regional Governance in East Asia: From ASEAN to an East Asian Community’, in ThomasN. (ed.), Governance and Regionalism in Asia.London: Routledge, pp. 32–65.
14.
Caballero-AnthonyM.EmmersR. and AcharyaA. (2006) Non-traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitisation.London: Ashgate.
15.
CammackP. (2007) ‘Competitiveness and Convergence: The Open Method of Co-ordination in Latin America’, Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University, Papers in the Politics of Global Competitiveness, No. 5.
16.
CaplingA. and NossalK. R. (2009) ‘The Contradictions of Regionalism in North America’, Review of International Studies, 35 (S1), 147–67.
17.
CarrollT. and SovacoolB. (2008) ‘Contested Regionalism in Southeast Asia: The Politics of the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline Project’. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Centre on Asia and Globalisation Working Paper 002.
18.
ChayesA. and Handler ChayesA. (1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19.
CoxK. R. (1998) ‘Spaces of Dependence, Spaces of Engagement and the Politics of Scale, or: Looking for Local Politics’, Political Geography, 17 (1), 1–23.
20.
CraigD. and PorterD. (2006) Development beyond Neoliberalism? Governance, Poverty Reduction and Political Economy.London: Routledge.
21.
DeanM. (1999) ‘Risk, Calculable and Incalculable’, in LuptonD. (ed.), Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–59.
22.
DieterH. (2008) ‘ASEAN and the Emerging Monetary Regionalism: A Case of Limited Contribution’, The Pacific Review, 21 (4), 489–506.
23.
DinnenS.McLeodA. and PeakeG. (2006) ‘Police-Building in Weak States: Australian Approaches in Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands’, Civil Wars, 8 (2), 87–108.
24.
DysonK. and GoetzK. (2003) Germany, Europe and the Politics of Constraint.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
European Union (EU) (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy.Paris: The European Union Institute for Security Studies.
26.
EwaldF. (1993) ‘Two Infinities of Risk’, in MassumiB. (ed.), The Politics of Everyday Fear.Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 221–8.
27.
FawnR. (2009) ‘“Regions” and their Study: Where from, What for and Where to?’, Review of International Studies, 35 (S1), 5–34.
28.
GibsonE. (2005) ‘Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries’, World Politics, 58 (1), 101–32.
29.
GiddensA. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity.Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
GiddensA. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late-Modern Age.Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
GiddensA. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy.Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
GoughJ. (2004) ‘Changing Scale as Changing Class Relations: Variety and Contradiction in the Politics of Scale’, Political Geography, 23 (2), 185–211.
33.
HaasE. (1964) Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization.Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
HameiriS. (2009a) ‘Beyond Methodological Nationalism, but Whereto for the Study of Regional Governance?’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 63 (3), 430–41.
35.
HameiriS. (2009b) ‘Governing Disorder: The Australian Federal Police and Australia's New Regional Frontier’, The Pacific Review, 22 (5), 549–74.
36.
Hamilton-HartN. (2002) Asian States, Asian Bankers: Central Banking in Southeast Asia.Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
HarveyD. (1985) The Urbanization of Capital.Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
HarveyD. (2006 [1982]) The Limits to Capital.London: Verso.
39.
HaselerS. (2005) The New Europe and its Challenge to America.London: I. B. Tauris.
40.
HengY. K. (2006) ‘The “Transformation of War” Debate: Through the Looking Glass of Ulrich Beck's World Risk Society’, International Relations, 20 (1), 69–91.
41.
HirschP. (2002) ‘Global Norms, Local Compliance and the Human Rights–Environment Nexus: A Case Study of the Nam Theun II Dam in Laos’, in ZarskyL. (ed.), Human Rights and the Environment: Conflicts and Norms in a Globalizing World.London: Earthscan, pp. 147–71.
42.
HirschP. (2006) ‘Water Governance Reform and Catchment Management in the Mekong Region’, The Journal of Environment and Development, 15 (2), 184–201.
43.
HoogheL. and MarksG. (2003) ‘Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance’, American Political Science Review, 97 (2), 233–43.
44.
HutchisonJ. (2007) ‘The “Disallowed” Political Participation of Manila's Urban Poor’, Democratization, 14 (5), 853–72.
45.
JayasuriyaK. (2004) ‘The New Regulatory State and Relational Capacity’, Policy and Politics, 32 (4), 487–501.
46.
JayasuriyaK. (2008) ‘Regionalising the State: Political Topography of Regulatory Regionalism’, Contemporary Politics, 14 (1), 21–35.
47.
JayasuriyaK. (2009) ‘Regulatory Regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Drivers, Instruments and Actors’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 63 (3), 335–47.
48.
JayasuriyaK. and RosserA. (2006) ‘Pathways from the Crisis: Politics and Reform in South-East Asia since 1997’, in RodanG.HewisonK. and RobisonR. (eds), The Political Economy of South-East Asia: Markets, Power and Contestation, third edition. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 258–82.
49.
JessopB. (1998) ‘The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure’, International Social Science Journal, 50 (155), 29–45.
50.
KatzensteinP. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium.Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
KnillC. and LehmkuhlD. (2002) ‘The National Impact of European Union Regulatory Policy: Three Europeanization Mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research, 41 (2), 255–80.
52.
KubicekP. (2009) ‘The Commonwealth of Independent States: An Example of Failed Regionalism?’, Review of International Studies, 35 (S1), 237–56.
53.
LakeD. A. (2009) ‘Regional Hierarchy: Authority and Local International Order’, Review of International Studies, 35 (S1), 35–58.
54.
MairP. (2004) ‘The Europeanization Dimension’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (2), 337–48.
55.
MasseyD. (1992) ‘Politics and Space/Time’, New Left Review, 196, 65–84.
56.
MilwardA. S. (2000) The European Rescue of the Nation State, second edition. London: Routledge.
57.
MitranyD. (1975) The Functional Theory of Politics.London: Martin Robertson and Co.
58.
MythenG. and WalklateS. (2008) ‘Terrorism, Risk and International Security: The Perils of Asking “What If?”’, Security Dialogue, 39 (2-3), 221–42.
59.
NarineS. (2004) ‘State Sovereignty, Political Legitimacy and Regional Institutionalism in the Asia-Pacific’, The Pacific Review, 17 (3), 423–50.
60.
NesaduraiH. E.S. (2005) ‘Regional Economic Surveillance and Financial Governance in East Asia: Knowledge, Interests and Policy Dialogue’. Paper presented to the Conference on Regionalisation and the Taming of Globalization, organized by the Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization, University of Warwick, 26-8 October.
61.
NesaduraiH. E. S. (2009) ‘Economic Surveillance as a New Mode of Regional Governance: Contested Knowledge and the Politics of Risk Management in East Asia’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 63 (3), 361–75.
62.
O'MalleyP. (2004) Risk, Uncertainty and Government.London: Glasshouse Press.
63.
PempelT. J. (1998) Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy.Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
64.
PerezA.F. (1995/6) ‘Review Essay: Who Killed Sovereignty? Or: Changing Norms Concerning Sovereignty in International Law’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 14, 463–90.
65.
PetersB.G. (2007) ‘The Meta-governance of Policy Networks: Steering at a Distance but Still Steering’. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Working Paper 78/2007.
66.
PhillipsN. (2001) ‘Regionalist Governance in the New Political Economy of Development: “Relaunching” the Mercosur’, Third World Quarterly, 22 (4), 565–83.
67.
PoulantzasN. (1978) State, Power and Socialism.London: New Left Books.
68.
RavenhillJ. (2009) ‘East Asian Regionalism: Much Ado about Nothing?’, Review of International Studies, 35 (S1), 215–35.
69.
RobertsonS. (2009) ‘The EU, Regulatory State Regionalism and New Modes of Higher Education Governance’. Paper presented to the panel Constituting the Knowledge Economy: Governing the New Regional Spaces of Higher Education, 50th International Studies Association Annual Convention, New York, 15–18 February 2009.
70.
RosserA. (2009) ‘Risk Management, Neo-liberalism and Coercion: The Asian Development Bank's Approach to “Fragile States”’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 63 (3), 376–89.
71.
SackR. (1986) Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1960) The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
73.
SimpsonA. (2007) ‘The Environment – Energy Security Nexus: Critical Analysis of an Energy “Love Triangle” in Southeast Asia’, Third World Quarterly, 28 (3), 539–54.
74.
SlaughterA. (1997) ‘The Real New World Order’, Foreign Affairs, 76 (5), 183–97.
75.
SlaughterA. (2004) ‘Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks’, Government and Opposition, 39 (2), 160–90.
76.
SpenceK. (2005) ‘World Risk Society and War against Terror’, Political Studies, 53 (2), 284–302.
77.
StevensonM. A. and CooperA.F. (2009) ‘Overcoming Constraints of State Sovereignty: Global Health Governance in Asia’, Third World Quarterly, 30 (7), 1379–94.
78.
SutherlandC. (2009) ‘Reconciling Nation and Region: Vietnamese Nation Building and ASEAN Regionalism’, Political Studies, 57 (2), 316–36.
79.
TaylorI. (2005) NEPAD: Towards Africa's Development or Another False Start.Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.
80.
TuckerC. M. (2003) ‘The Lisbon Strategy and the Open Mode of Coordination: A New Vision and the Revolutionary Potential of Soft Governance in the European Union’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 28–31 August.
81.
United Nations (2004) United Nations High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change.New York: United Nations.
82.
WallaceH. (2002) ‘Europeanisation and Globalisation: Complementary or Contradictory Trends?’, in BreslinS.HughesC.PhillipsN. and RosamondB. (eds), New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases.London: Routledge, pp. 137–49.
83.
WalterA. (2008) Governing Finance: East Asia's Adoption of International Standards.Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
84.
White House (2002) National Security Strategy of the United States.Washington DC: White House.
85.
WimmerA. and SchillerN. G. (2002) ‘Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences’, Global Networks, 2 (4), 301–34.
