Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-2
Concurrent Elections and Voter Turnout: The Effect of the De-Linking of State Elections on Electoral Participation in India's Parliamentary Polls,1971-2004
This article examines the effect that the decoupling of state and national elections has had on voter turnout in India's national parliamentary polls since 1971. According to conventional wisdom in the comparative literature on electoral turnout, separate elections to multiple levels and/or branches of government should depress turnout relative to co-temporal polls, ceteris paribus. The evidence from Indian elections provides strong confirmation for this hypothesis. This suggests that political decentralization through separate national and local elections may actually weaken citizens' incentives to participate in the democratic electoral process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichJ. (1993) ‘Rational Choice and Turnout’, American Journal of Political Science, 37 (1), 246–78.
2.
BlaisA. (2000) To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
3.
BlaisA.CartyK. (1990) ‘Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout?’, European Journal of Political Research, 18 (2), 167–81.
4.
BlaisA.DobrzynskaA. (1998) ‘Turnout in Electoral Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 33 (2), 239–61.
5.
BrassP. (1965) Factional Politics in an Indian State. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
6.
ChandraK. (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ChhibberP. (1999) Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
8.
ChhibberP.KollmanK. (1998) ‘Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States’, American Political Science Review, 92 (2), 329–42.
9.
ChhibberP.NooruddinI. (2000) ‘Party Competition and Fragmentation in Indian National Elections: 1957–1998’, in WallaceP.RoyP. (eds), Indian Politics and the 1998 Elections: Regionalism, Hindutva, and State Politics. New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 36–54.
10.
CoxG. (1999) ‘Electoral Rules and the Calculus of Mobilization’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 24 (3), 387–419.
11.
FiorinaM. P. (1976) ‘The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects’, The Journal of Politics, 38 (2), 390–413.
12.
FornosC. A.PowerT. J.GarandJ. C. (2004) ‘Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000’, Comparative Political Studies, 37 (8), 909–40.
13.
FranklinM. (2001) ‘How Structural Factors Cause Turnout Variations at European Parliamentary Elections’, European Union Politics, 2 (3), 309–28.
14.
FranklinM. (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FranklinM.HirczyW. (1998) ‘Separated Powers, Divided Government, and Turnout in US Presidential Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 42 (1), 316–26.
16.
GrofmanB. (1993) ‘Is Turnout the Paradox that Ate Rational Choice Theory?’, in GrofmanB. (ed.), Information, Participation, and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 93–103.
17.
HanksC.GrofmanB. (1998) ‘Turnout in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Primary and General Elections in the South, 1922–90: A Rational Choice Model of the Effects of Short-Run and Long-Run Electoral Competition on Relative Turnout’, Public Choice, 94 (3–4), 407–21.
18.
HeathA.CurticeI.McLeanI.TaylorB. (1999) ‘Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behavior in European and Local Elections in Britain’, European Journal of Political Research, 35 (3), 389–414.
19.
JackmanR. (1987) ‘Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 81 (2), 405–23.
20.
JackmanR.MillerR. A. (1995) ‘Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 27 (4), 467–92.
21.
KothariR. (1964) ‘The Congress “System” in India’, Asian Survey, 4 (12), 1161–73.
22.
LaaksoM.TaageperaR. (1979) ‘Effective Number of Parties. A Measure with Application to Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12 (1), 3–27.
23.
MalikY. K.SinghV. B. (1994) Hindu Nationalists in India: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.
24.
MallickR. (1994) Indian Communism: Opposition, Collaboration, and Institutionalization. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
25.
ManorJ. (1995) ‘Regional Parties in Federal Systems’, in AroraB.VerneyD. (eds), Multiple Identities in a Single State: Indian Federalism in Comparative Perspective. New Delhi: Konark, pp. 105–35.
26.
ManorJ. (2005) ‘In Part, a Myth: The BJP's Organizational Strength’, in AdeneyK.SaezL. (eds), Coalition Politics and Hindu Nationalism. New York: Routledge, pp. 55–74.
27.
MarshM. (1998) ‘Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 28 (4), 591–607.
28.
OlsonM. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29.
PowellB. (1986) ‘American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective’, American Political Science Review, 80 (1), 17–43.
30.
RadcliffB. (1992) ‘The Welfare State, Turnout and Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 86 (2), 444–54.
31.
RallingsC.ThrasherM. (2005) ‘Not All “Second-Order” Contests are the Same: Turnout and Party Choice at the Concurrent 2004 Local and European Parliament Elections in England’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7 (4), 584–97.
32.
ReifK. (1984) ‘National Election Cycles and European Elections, 1979 and 1984’, Electoral Studies, 3 (3), 244–55.
33.
ReifK.SchmittH. (1980) ‘Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results’, European Journal of Political Research, 8 (1), 3–45.
34.
RikerW.OrdeshookP. (1968) ‘A Theory of the Calculus of Voting’, American Political Science Review, 62 (1), 25–42.
35.
RosenstoneS.HansenJ. M. (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
36.
RudolphL. (1971) ‘Continuities and Change in Electoral Behavior: The 1971 Parliamentary Election in India’, Asian Survey, 11 (12), 1119–32.
37.
RudolphL.RudolphS. H. (1987) In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
38.
SaezL. (2002) Federalism without Centre: The Impact of Political and Economic Reform on India's Federal System. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
39.
SchmittH. (2005) ‘The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order?’, West European Politics, 28 (3), 650–79.
40.
SinghM. P. (1981) Split in a Predominant Party: The Indian National Congress in 1969. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications.
41.
StromK. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
VarshneyA. (2000) ‘Is India Becoming More Democratic?’, The Journal of Asian Studies, 59 (1), 3–25.
43.
WeinerM. (1971) ‘The 1971 Elections and the Indian Party System’, Asian Survey, 11 (12), 1153–66.
44.
YadavY. (1996) ‘Reconfiguration in Indian Politics’, Economic and Political Weekly, 13–20 January, 95–104.
45.
YadavY. (2000) ‘Understanding the Second Democratic Upsurge: Trends of Bahujan Participation in Electoral Politics in the 1990s’, in FrankelF.HasanZ.BhargavaR.AroraB. (eds), Transforming India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 120–45.
