When, if at all, can the fact that a person is responsible for his or her disadvantage justify leaving him or her to bear that disadvantage? Possibly no other question has caused more controversy among political theorists of egalitarianism in the last two decades. This article aims to show that it is possible to move beyond the answer to this question that is usually (rightly or wrongly) attributed to luck egalitarians without accepting the conclusion that a concern with responsibility is only marginal to theories of egalitarian justice. I identify the conditions under which disadvantage brought about through the exercise of responsibility should be accepted as just and show why egalitarians concerned with fair shares must sometimes accept as just even grave disadvantages.
FreemanS. (2007) Justice and the Social Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
GallieD. (2004) Resisting Marginalization: Unemployment Experience and Social Policy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
HintonT. (2001) ‘Must Egalitarians Choose between Fairness and Respect?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30 (1), 72–87.
18.
HumeD. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature, second Selby-Bigge edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
KalvenH.ZeiselH. (1971) The American Jury. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
KaufmanA. (2004) ‘Choice, Responsibility and Equality’, Political Studies, 52 (4), 819–36.
21.
KingD. (1999) In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in Britain and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
KymlickaW. (2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
LakeC. (2001) Equality and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
MacleodC. M. (1998) Liberalism, Justice and Markets: A Critique of Liberal Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
MatraversM. (2002a) ‘Responsibility, Luck, and the “Equality of What?” Debate’, Political Studies, 50 (3), 558–72.
26.
MatraversM. (2002b) ‘Luck, Responsibility, and “The Jumble of Lotteries that Constitutes Human Life” ’, Imprints, 6 (1), 28–43.
27.
OlsarettiS. (2007) ‘Responsibility and the Consequences of Choice’, Working paper.
28.
RakowskiE. (1991) Equal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
RawlsJ. (1999) A Theory of Justice, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
RipsteinA. (1999) Equality, Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
RoemerJ. (1994) Egalitarian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
RoemerJ. (1996) Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
ScanlonT. M. (2003) The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
ScanlonT. M. (2006) ‘Justice, Responsibility, and the Demands of Equality’, in SypnowichC. (ed.), The Egalitarian Conscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70–87.
35.
SchefflerS. (2003a) ‘What is Egalitarianism?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (1), 5–39.
36.
SchefflerS. (2003b) ‘Equality as the Virtue of Sovereigns: A Reply to Ronald Dworkin’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2), 90–206.
37.
SchefflerS. (2005) ‘Choice, Circumstance, and the Value of Equality’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4 (1), 5–28.
38.
ShiffrinS. V. (2004) ‘Egalitarianism, Choice-Sensitivity, and Accommodation’, in WallaceR. J.PettitP.SchefflerS.SmithM. (eds), Reason and Values: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 270–302.
39.
SteinerH. (2002) ‘How Equality Matters’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 19 (1), 342–56.
40.
TemkinL. (1993) Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
VoorhoeveA. (forthcoming) ‘Scanlon on Substantive Responsibility’, Journal of Political Philosophy.
43.
WhiteS. (2003) The Civic Minimum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
WilliamsA. (2005) ‘Living as Equals: Right or Responsibility?’. Paper to Political Theory Research Seminar, Department of Politics and International Relations, Oxford University, 8 June.
45.
WilliamsA. (2006) ‘Liberty, Equality, and Property’, in DryzekJ. S.HonigB.PhillipsA. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 488–506.
