Widely considered a conservative British philosopher, this article presents Michael Oakeshott as, in fact, a critic of conservatism — in particular of the German conservative tradition, represented, among other thinkers, by Ferdinand Tönnies. This tradition was characterised by the rejection of modern individualistic society considered as an embodiment of alienating purpose-oriented rationalism. At a certain phase of his intellectual development Oakeshott himself came under the influence of this conservative critique, with ideas strikingly similar to those of Tönnies. Yet, unlike Tönnies, Oakeshott later rejected the premises of this tradition. Instead, he formulated the notion of rationalistic non-purposive association, which allowed him to become reconciled to modern liberal society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonP. (1992) ‘The Intransigent Right at the End of the Century’, London Review of Books, 14 (September), pp. 7−11.
2.
BoucherD. (2000) ‘Michael Oakeshott: The Non-economic Character of Civil Association’, in BoucherD.VincentA. (eds), British Idealism and Political Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 210−35.
3.
CahnmanW. J. (1973) ‘Tönnies and Social Change’, in CahnmanW. J. (ed.), Ferdin and Tönnies: A New Evaluation. Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 103−24.
4.
CoatsW. J. (1985) ‘Michael Oakeshott as Liberal Theorist’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 18 (4), 773−87.
5.
CovellC. (1986) The Redefinition of Conservatism: Politics and Doctrine. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
6.
CrickB. (1963) ‘The World of Michael Oakeshott: Or the Lonely Nihilist’, Encounter, 20 (June), 65−74.
7.
DumontL. (1994) German Ideology: From France to Germany and Back. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
EmersonR. (1928) State and Sovereignty in Modern Germany. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
9.
FalckC. (1963) ‘Romanticism in Politics’, New Left Review, 18 (Jan-Feb), 60−71.
10.
FrancoP. (1990) ‘Michael Oakeshott as Liberal Theorist’, Political Theory, 18 (3), 411−36.
11.
GismondiM. (2004) ‘Tragedy, Realism, and Postmodernity: Kulturpessimismus in the Theories of Max Weber, E. H. Carr, Hans J. Morgenthau, and Henry Kissinger’, Diplomacy & Statecraft, 15 (3), 435−64.
12.
GrayJ. (1993) ‘Oakeshott as a Liberal’, in Post-Liberalism: Studies in Political Thought. London: Routledge, pp. 40−6.
13.
HarrisJ. (2001) ‘General Introduction’, in TönniesF. (ed.), Community and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. ix−xxx.
14.
HenkelM. (2006) ‘A Conservative Concept of Freedom: Otto von Gierke's Genossenschaftslehre and Oakeshott's Practical Philosophy’, Paper presented at the Michael Oakeshott Association Conference, Colorado Springs, USA, 8-11 June.
15.
HollidayI. (1992) ‘On Michael Oakeshott’, Government and Opposition, 27 (2), 131−47.
16.
IggersG. (1983) The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present. Middletown CO: Wesleyan University Press.
17.
IzenbergG. (1992) Impossible Individuality: Romanticism, Revolution and the Origins of Modern Selfhood. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1787−802.
18.
KalbergS. (1987) ‘The Origin and Expansion of Kulturpessimismus: The Relationship between Public and Private Spheres in Early Twentieth Century Germany’Sociological Theory, 5 (2), 150−64.
19.
La VopaA. (1988) Grace, Talent, and Merit: Poor Students, Clerical Careers, and Professional Ideology in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LevineD. N. (1995) Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
21.
LindenfeldD. F. (1997) The Practical Imagination: The German Science of State in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
MannheimK. (1953) ‘Conservative Thought’, in Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 74−164.
23.
MitzmanA. (1971) ‘Tönnies and German Society, 1887-1914: From Cultural Pessimism to Celebration of the Volksgemeinschaft’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 32 (4), 507−24.
24.
MitzmanA. (1973) Sociology and Estrangement: Three Sociologists in Imperial Germany. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
25.
NardinT. (2001) The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott. University Park IL: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
26.
OakeshottM. (1936-7) ‘Review of Mannheim's Ideology and Utopia’, Cambridge Review, 58, 257.
27.
OakeshottM. (1975) On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28.
OakeshottM. (1991a) ‘Rational Conduct’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 99−131.
29.
OakeshottM. (1991b) ‘Rationalism in Politics’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 5−42.
30.
OakeshottM. (1991c) ‘The Political Economy of Freedom’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 384−406.
31.
OakeshottM. (1991d) ‘The Tower of Babel’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 465−87.
32.
OakeshottM. (1991e) ‘The Voice* of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 488−541.
33.
O'SullivanL. (2003) Oakeshott on History. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
34.
PitkinH. F. (1973) ‘The Roots of Conservatism: Michael Oakeshott and the Denial of Politics’, Dissent, 20 (4), 496−525.
35.
PodoksikE. (2003a) In Defence of Modernity: Vision and Philosophy in Michael Oakeshott. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
36.
PodoksikE. (2003b) ‘Oakeshott's Theory of Freedom as Recognized Contingency’, European Journal of Political Theory, 2 (1), 57−77.
37.
PodoksikE. (2005) ‘How Oakeshott Became an Oakeshottean’, European Journal of Political Theory, 4 (1), 67−88.
38.
PostanM. (1947-8) ‘The Revulsion from Thought’, Cambridge Journal, 1, 395−408.
39.
RaynerJ. D. (1985) ‘The Legend of Oakeshott's Conservatism: Sceptical Philosophy and Limited Politics’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 18 (2), 313−38.
40.
RobinsonM. (2000) ‘The Conservative Devaluation of Value’, Salmagundi, 126-7, 3−44.
41.
RuncimanD. (1997) Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
SalomonA. (1973) ‘In Memoriam Ferdinand Tönnies (1855-1936)’, in CahnmanW. J. (ed.), Ferdin and Tönnies: A New Evaluation. Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 33−46.
43.
SamplesJ. (1987) ‘Kant, Tönnies and the Liberal Idea of Community in Early German Sociology’, History of Political Thought, 8 (2), 245−62.
44.
SimmelG. (1971) ‘Freedom and the Individual’, in LevineD. N. (ed.), Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 217−26.
45.
SimmelG. (2001) ‘Das individuelle Gesetz’, in Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 12. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 417−70.
46.
TönniesF. (2001) Community and Civil Society, Trans. HarrisJ.HollisM.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
WilliamsM. (1983) ‘Liberalism and Two Conceptions of the State’, in MacLeanD.MillsC. (eds), Liberalism Reconsidered. Totowa NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, pp. 117−29.
