Drawing upon Jürgen Habermas's discourse-based theoretical approach, this article argues that his thesis regarding the bourgeois public sphere needs to be redirected so as (1) to show how sources of communicative action may have dried up within the bourgeois public sphere and (2) to explore real emancipatory alternatives that spring up as oppositional voices of subaltern groups, oriented to understanding, and expressed in contexts wherein people's upward struggles against power and domination have not yet been completed. In support of the argument, a stereoscopic analysis is conducted that focuses on public sphere practices and counter-practices – specifically those of The New York Times as exemplar participant of bourgeois publicness and the black-owned and operated New York Amsterdam News as its oppositional counterpart.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderE. (1995) ‘“Can You Be Black and Look Like This?” Reading the Rodney King Videos’, in Black Public Sphere Collective (ed.), The Black Public Sphere. Chicago IL: University of Chicago, pp. 81–98.
2.
BakerH.Jr (1999) ‘Critical Memory and the Black Public Sphere’, in Ben-AmosD.WeissbergL. (eds), Cultural Memory and the Construction of Identity. Detroit MI: Wayne State University.
3.
BarakaA. (1999) ‘The Rise of US Black-Aimed Death Squads Among the Police’, New York Amsterdam News, 17 March, 12.
4.
Barkley BrownE. (1995) ‘Negotiating and Transforming the Public Sphere: African-American Political Life in the Transition from Slavery to Freedom’, in Black Public Sphere Collective (ed.), The Black Public Sphere. Chicago IL: University of Chicago, pp. 111–50.
5.
BaumeisterA. (2003) ‘Habermas: Discourse and Cultural Diversity’, Political Studies, 51 (4), 740–58.
6.
BergerJ. (1983) ‘Review of J. Habermas’ “Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns”’, Telos, 57 (Spring), 194–205.
7.
BlaugR. (1997) ‘Between Fear and Disappointment: Critical, Empirical and Political Uses of Habermas’, Political Studies, 45 (1), 100–17.
8.
BohmanJ. (1986) ‘Formal Pragmatics and Social Criticism: The Philosophy of Language and the Critique of Ideology in Habermas's “Theory of Communicative Action” ’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 11 (4), 332–52.
9.
BohmanJ. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT.
10.
BoydH. (1999a) ‘Amadou Diallo's Homegoing: Sharpton and Cochran to Lead Case Against PBA’, New York Amsterdam News, 3 March, 3.
11.
BoydH. (1999b) ‘New York's Honor Roll’, New York Amsterdam News, 24 March, 1.
12.
BreedenJ. O. (1980) ‘Introduction’, in BreedenJ. O. (ed.), Advice Among Masters: The Ideal in Slave Management in the Old South. Westport CT: Greenwood.
13.
BrownH. R. (1972) ‘Street Talk’, in KochmanT. (ed.), Rappin’ and Stylin’ Out: Communication in Urban Black America. Urbana IL: University of Illinois, pp. 205–8.
14.
CalhounC. (1992) ‘Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere’, in CalhounJ. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT, pp. 1–31.
15.
ChoS. (1993) ‘Korean Americans vs. African Americans: Conflict and Construction’, in Gooding-WilliamsR. (ed.), Reading Rodney King/Reading Urban Uprising. New York: Routledge, pp. 196–214.
16.
ConawayC. (1999) ‘Crown Heights: Politics and Press Coverage of the Race War That Wasn't’, Polity, 32 (1), 93–118.
17.
CookeM. (1994) Language and Reason: A study of Habermas's Pragmatics. Cambridge: MIT.
18.
CrimpD.RolstonA. (1990) AIDS Demographics. Seattle WA: Bay Press.
19.
DavisD. B. (1969) The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
DavisD. B. (1976) ‘Slavery and the American Mind’, in OwensH. P. (ed.), Perspectives and Irony in American Slavery. Jackson MS: University of Mississippi, pp. 51–69.
21.
DavisO. (2005) ‘Vigilance and Solidarity in the Rhetoric of the Black Press: The Tulsa Star’, Journal of Intergroup Relations, 32 (3), 32–47.
22.
DeveauxM. (2000) Cultural Pluralism and Dilemmas of Justice. Ithaca NY: Cornell.
23.
DiamondE. (1994) Behind the Times: Inside the New ‘New York Times’. New York: Villard.
24.
DryzekJ. (1996) ‘Political Inclusion and the Dynamics of Democratization’, American Political Science Review, 90 (1), 475–87.
25.
EleyG. (1992) ‘Nations, Publics and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century’, in CalhounC. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT.
26.
ElsterJ. (1998) ‘Deliberation and Constitution Making’, in ElsterJ. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–122.
27.
EyermanR.JamisonA. (1991) Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity.
28.
FlynnK. (1999) ‘Shooting in the Bronx: The Investigation; Four Officers Not Obliged to Explain Shooting’, New York Times, 14 February, A38.
29.
ForesterJ. (1985) Critical Theory and Public Life. London: MIT.
30.
FraserN. (1990) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
31.
GenoveseE. (1974) Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made. New York: Vintage.
32.
GregoryS. (1995) ‘Race, Identity and Political Activism: The Shifting Contours of the African American Public Sphere’, in Black Public Sphere Collective (ed.), The Black Public Sphere. Chicago IL: University of Chicago, pp. 151–68.
33.
GunsonD.CollinsC. (1997) ‘From the I to the We: Discourse Ethics, Identity and the Pragmatics of Partnership in the West of Scotland’, Communication Theory, 7 (4), 278–300.
34.
HabermanC. (1999) ‘A Shooting, and Shooting from the Hip’, New York Times, 12 February, B1.
35.
HabermasJ. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Trans. McCarthyT.. Boston MA: Beacon.
36.
HabermasJ. (1984) Theory of Communicative Action v.1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Trans. McCarthyT.. Boston MA: Beacon.
37.
HabermasJ. (1989 [1962]) Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Trans. BergerT.. Cambridge: MIT.
38.
HabermasJ. (1992) ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’, in CalhounC. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT.
39.
HabermasJ. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Trans. RehgW.. Cambridge: MIT.
40.
HabermasJ. (1998) ‘Remarks on Legitimation through Human Rights’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 24 (2/3), 157–71.
HerbstS. (1994) Politics at the Margin: Historical Studies of Public Expression Outside the Mainstream. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
HonnethA. (1991) The Critique of Power. Trans. BaynesK.. Cambridge: MIT.
44.
HorowitzA. (1998) ‘“Like a Tangled Mobile”: Reason and Reification in the Quasi-dialectical Theory of Jürgen Habermas’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 24 (1), 1–23.
45.
HuspekM. (2004) ‘Black Press, White Press, and Their Opposition: The Case of the Police Killing of Tyisha Miller’, Social Justice, 31 (1–2), 217–41.
46.
HuspekM. (2005) ‘“From the Standpoint of the White Man's World”: The Black Press and Contemporary White Media Scholarship, with Emphasis upon the Work of W. Lance Bennett’, Journal of Intergroup Relations, 32 (3), 67–88.
47.
JamesM. B. (2004) Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity. Lawrence KS: University of Kansas.
48.
JoasH. (1988) ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Hermeneutics and Functionalism’, Praxis International, 8 (1), 34–51.
49.
JonesA. (1999) The Trust: The Private and Powerful Family Behind The New York Times. New York: Brown.
50.
KeaneJ. (1988) Democracy and Civil Society. London: Verso.
51.
KimC. J. (2000) Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black–Korean Conflict in New York City. New Haven CT: Yale.
52.
McAdamD. (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
53.
MaddoxA.Jr (1999) ‘No Justice! No Peace!’, New York Amsterdam News, 24 February, 13.
54.
MendelbergT. (2001) The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
MorganM. (1998) ‘More than a Mood or an Attitude: Discourse and Verbal Genres in African-American Culture’, in MufweneS.RickfordJ.BaileyG.BaughJ. (eds), African-American English: Structure, History and Use. London: Routledge, pp. 251–81.
56.
MyrdalG. (1944) An American Dilemma. New York: Harper and Bros.
57.
NegtO.KlugeA. (1993 [1972]) Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Spheres. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota.
58.
New York Times Manual of Style and Usage (1999) New York: Random House.
59.
OwensR. (1999) ‘Entering the 21st Century: Oppression and the African-American Press’, in BerryV. T.Manning-MillerC. (eds), Mediated Messages and African-American Culture. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, pp. 96–116.
60.
PryceV. K. (1999) ‘Women's Scorn Lands on City Hall’, New York Amsterdam News, 17 March, 4.
61.
ReyesD. (1999) ‘Protests Follow Diallo Funeral’, New York Amsterdam News, 24 February, 3.
62.
RossF.CamaraS. (2005) ‘The African-American Press and the Holocaust’, Journal of Intergroup Relations, 32 (3), 32–47.
63.
RuaneJ.ToddJ. (1988) ‘The Application of Critical Theory’, Political Studies, 36 (3), 533–58.
64.
SalisburyH. (1980) Without Fear or Favor: The New York Times and Its Times. New York: Times Books.
65.
ShepardR. (1996) The Paper's Papers: A Reporter's Journal through the Archives of the New York Times. New York: Random House.
66.
SmithermanG. (2000) Talkin’ That Talk: Language, Culture and Education in African America. New York: Routledge.
67.
SnyderJ. (2000) From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.
68.
SpearsA. (2001) ‘Directness in the use of African American English’, in LanehartS. L. (ed.), Sociocultural and Historical Contexts of African-American English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 239–60.
69.
TaleseG. (1969) The Kingdom and the Power. New York: World Publishing.
70.
TatumE. (2004) Personal interview with Associate Editor of New York Amsterdam News, conducted 6 March 2004.
71.
TatumW. A. (1999a) ‘Giuliani: A Monster in Our Midst’, New York Amsterdam News, 24 February, 12.
72.
TatumW. A. (1999b) ‘It's Only a Matter of Time: Giuliani's Political Demise’, New York Amsterdam News, 3 March, 12.
73.
ToobinJ. (2000) ‘The Unasked Question’, New Yorker, 76 (2), 38–44.
74.
TuchS.WeitzerR. (1997) ‘The Polls-Trends: Racial Differences in Attitudes Toward the Police’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 642–63.
