The reasons for change in state elites' perceptions of the adversary are fiercely contested by realists, constructivistis and neo-liberals in the international relations literature. A series of events -beginning with the October 1973 war and culminating in the Oslo peace process — offers a unique opportunity to assess the value of these theories in explaining change in the perceptions of Israel and Zionism in Syria, Egypt and Jordan. This study is based on articles on Israel and Zionism that appeared in the official army journals of these three states. The analysis suggests that, since the 1973 war, Egypt has perceived Israel as a formidable foe that must be restrained, Syria continues to deny Israel's legitimacy, and Jordan's perceptions of Israel changed dramatically from demonization to recognition. The realist paradigm, which focuses on changes in the regional and international balance of power, does best in explaining variations in the portrayal of Israel amongst these actors. Nevertheless, none of the theories offers a complete, timeless explanation of the issue. The limitations of any single theory to account for change in the perceptions of the adversary suggest that caution should be used in attempting to capture the complexity of social and political life in any single overarching theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlyA. S. (1996) ‘The Shattered Consensus: Arab Perceptions of Security’, International Spectator, 31 (4), 25–32.
2.
AltunisikM. (2002) ‘The Syrian Army: How Much of an Actor in Syrian Politics?’, Review of International Affairs, 1 (3), 82–94.
3.
al-Aqsa (1994a) no. 867 (October), 25.
4.
al-Aqsa (1994b) no. 866 (September), 78.
5.
al-Aqsa (1994c) no. 867 (October), 6.
6.
al-Aqsa (1998a) no. 907 (February), 48.
7.
al-Aqsa (1998b) ‘Jalalat al-Qa'id al-Ala fi Muqbala Ma'a Sahifat Filadilfiya Inquiror al-Amerikiya’ [His Highness, the Supreme Commander in an Interview with the Newspaper the American Philadelphia Inquirer], no. 907 (February), 20–1.
8.
Al-Aqsa (1998c) ‘Samu al-Amir al-Hasan Yulqi Kalimat al-Urdunn fil-Qimma al-Islamiyya’[His Highness Prince Hassan Presents Jordan's Position in the Islamic Summit], no. 906 (January), 80–9.
9.
Al-Aqsa (1998d) ‘Netanyahu Yas'a li-Taqwidh Oslo wa-Taghyir Masirat al-Salam’[King Hussein: Netanyahu is Trying to Demolish Oslo and to Change the Essence of the Peace Process], no. 906 (January), 34–41.
10.
Al-Aqsa (1998e) ‘al-Urdunn al-Sanad al-Qawi li'l-Dawla al-Filastiniyya’[Jordan Serves as the Strong Prop for the Palestinian State], no. 907 (February), 20–7.
11.
AyoobM. (1991) ‘The Security Problematic in the Third World’, World Politics, 43 (2), 257–83.
12.
Al-'AzzamS. (1992) ‘al-Nawaya al-Isra'iliyya al-Sawsa‘ did al-’Arab’ [The Sinister Israeli Intentions against the Arabs], Jaish al-Sha'b, no. 1679 (15 March), 12–13.
13.
Al-'AzzamS. (1994) ‘Isra'il Tastamiru Fi Muhawalatiha li-Ijhad ‘Amaliyyat al-Salam waliyuqami'a al-Mintaqa’ [Israel Continues in Its Attempts to Abort the Peace Process and Subordinate the Region], Jaish al-Sha'b, no. 1725 (15 February), 8–9.
14.
BarnettM. (1991) ‘High Politics is Low Politics: The Domestic and Systemic Sources of Israeli Security Policy, 1967–1977’, World Politics, 42 (4), 529–62.
15.
BarnettM. N. (1995) ‘Sovereignty, Nationalism, and Regional Order in the Arab States System’, International Organization, 49 (3), 479–510.
16.
BarnettM. N.FinnemoreM. (1999) ‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization, 53 (4), 699–732.
17.
Ben-DorG. (1984) State, Society and Military Elites in the Middle East.Tel-Aviv: Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies.
BrooksR. (1999) Political-Military Relations and the Stability of Arab Regimes (Adelphi Paper 324).New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Al-BudiM. (1992) ‘al-Matami‘ al-Sahiyuniyya fi al-Maya al-’Arabiyya’ [The Zionist Schemes for Arab Water], Jaish al-Sha'b, no. 1680 (1 April), 16–17.
21.
CruzC. (2000) ‘Identity and Persuasion: How Nations Remember Their Pasts and Make Their Futures’, World Politics, 52 (3), 275–312.
22.
van DamN. (1996) The Struggle for Power in Syria: Policies and Society under Asad and the Ba'ath Party.London: I. B. Tauris.
23.
Al-DasukiM. I. (1995) ‘al-Mu'tamar al-Dawli Hawla Amn al-Bahr al-Mutawassit: Qadaya wa-Tahadiyyat-Jadida’ [The International Conference Concerning the Security of the Mediterranean: Issues and Challenges], al-Siyasa al-Dawliyya, no. 123 (January), 290–1.
24.
DavidS. R. (1991) ‘Explaining Third World Alignment’, World Politics, 43 (1), 233–56.
25.
De AtkineN. (1999) ‘Why Arabs Lose Wars’, Middle East Quarterly, 6 (4), 17–28.
26.
Droz-VincentP. (1999) ‘Le militairez et le politique en Egypte’, Monde arabe Maghreb-Machreq, no. 165, 16–35.
27.
Al-DweikG. (1997) ‘al-Taswiya al-Silmiyya: Ma Ba'da al-Doha’ [The Peaceful Settlement: What Will Be after Doha], al-Nasr, no. 702 (December), 31–4.
Jaish al-Sha'b (1986) ‘Khiyana Jadida Yartakibuha Malik al-Maghrib bi-Haqq al-Umma al-'Arabiyya’[New Treachery is Committed by the King of Morocco against the Arab Nation], no. 1563 (1 August), 13.
41.
Jaish al-Sha'b (1994) no. 1727 (15 March), 8–10.
42.
Jaish al-Sha'b (1998a) ‘Waqfat ma'a al-Dhikra al-Wahida wal-Khamsin li-Ta'sis Hizbina al-‘Azim – Hizb al-Ba'ath al-’Arabi al-Ishtiraki’[Reflections on the Fifty-First Anniversary of the Establishment of Our Great Party — the Arab Socialist Ba'th Party], no. 1824 (1 April), 4–5.
43.
Jaish al-Sha'b (1998b) no. 1832 (1 August), 4–5.
44.
Al-JamalS. (1994) ‘al-Mashru’ al-Sharq al-Awsati wal-Mustaqbal al-Arabi’ [The Middle Eastern Project and the Arab Future], al-Mustaqbal al-'Arabi, no. 196, 4–28.
45.
JumhurS. (1989) ‘Judhur al-Sira bayna Almaniya al-Naziyya wal-Sahiyuniyya al- Alamiyya’ [The Roots of the Struggle between Nazi Germany and World Zionism], al-Aqsa, no. 807 (October), 57–9.
46.
KeohaneR. O. (ed.) (1986) Neorealism and Its Critics.New York: Colombia University Press.
MarsiM. A. (1995) al-Arab fi Muftaraq al-Turuq: Bayna Dharurat Tajdid al-Mashru'al-'Qawmi wa-Mahadhir al-Mashru'al-Sharq Awsati [The Arabs at the Crossroads: Between the Necessity of Renewal of the National Project and the Realities of the Middle Eastern Project]. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
49.
MubarakH. (1981) ‘al-Ra'is Mubarak fi Awal Khitab Lahu’ [President Mubarak in his First Speech], al-Nasr, no. 508 (October), 37–43.
50.
al-Nasr (1973) no. 415 (September), 17–18.
51.
Al-Nasr (1979) ‘Marhalat Istiqrar al-Salam wa-Afaq Jadida’[The Stage of Stabilizing Peace and New Horizons], no. 479 (May), 10–11.
52.
Al-Nasr (1995a) no. 672 (June), 24–5.
53.
Al-Nasr (1995b) ‘Asrana.waShahadat al- Adu’[Our Prisoners and the Testimonies of the Enemy], no. 676 (October), 44.
54.
Al-NazirJ. (1979) al-Nasr, no. 479 (May), 2–3.
55.
PeresS. (1993) The New Middle East.New York: Henry Holt.
QuinlivanJ. T. (1999) ‘Coup-Proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East’, International Security, 24 (2), 131–65.
58.
RichardsA.WaterburyJ. (1996) A Political Economy of the Middle East.Boulder CO: Westview Press.
59.
RussettB. M.O'NealJ. R.CoxM. (2000) ‘Clash of Civilizations, or Realism and Liberalism Deja Vu? Some Evidence: 1945–1994’, Journal of Peace Research, 37 (5), 583–608.
60.
RyanC. R. (1998) ‘Bread and Riots: Jordan and the IMF’, Middle East Policy, 6 (2), 54–66.
61.
ShashT. (1995) al-Muwajaha wal-Salam fil Sharq al-Awsat [Confrontation and Peace in the Middle East]. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
62.
SulaymanS. A. (1998) ‘al-Qiyyam al-Asila alati biha Yasmi al-Watan’ [The Noble Values by Which the Homeland Is Exalted], Jaish al-Sha'b, no. 1825 (15 April), 26–8.
