The emotional significance of sensory events may influence attention in a reflexive manner, but these effects vary across paradigms and participants. Recent research indicates that specific circuits in the brain may serve to amplify neural responses to emotional stimuli, a modulation similar to attentional effects usually driven by endogenous goals. However, this modulation involves distinct sources in emotional systems such as the amygdala, and may thus operate partly independent of top-down control by attentional systems in frontoparietal cortices. It remains to be clarified to what degree these emotional effects are influenced by specific perceptual and emotional dimensions, automaticity and attentional resources, task goals or expectations, and individual personality traits.
BishopS. (2008). (See References). This review discusses the relationship between anxiety states, processing of threat, and attentional effects in details.
2.
FrischenA.EastwoodJ.D.SmilekD. (2008). (See References). A detailed review of behavioral studies showing emotional influences during search, with a discussion of visual and attentional factors implicated in such effects.
3.
PessoaL.UngerleiderL.G. (2004). (See References). This review provides a detailed review of neural mechanisms of visual attention and emphasizes attentional modulatory effects that may be similar for emotional and nonemotional stimuli, suggesting a lack of preferential processing when attentional resources are exhausted by a concurrent task.
4.
VuilleumierP.DriverJ. (2007). (See References). A general summary of results demonstrating a separate modulation of visual processing by emotion and attention, with a review of the underlying neural substrates and experimental approaches used.
5.
ArmonyJ.L.DolanR.J. (2002). Modulation of spatial attention by fear-conditioned stimuli: An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 817–826.
6.
BarM.NetaM. (2007). Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2191–2200.
7.
BishopS. (2008). Neural mechanisms underlying selective attention to threat. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1129, 141–152.
EimerM.HolmesA. (2007). Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. Neuropsychologia, 45, 15–31.
10.
FredricksonB.L.BraniganC. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332.
11.
FrischenA.EastwoodJ.D.SmilekD. (2008). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 662–676.
12.
GrandjeanD.SanderD.PourtoisG.SchwartzS.SeghierM.L.SchererK.R., et al. (2005). The voices of wrath: Brain responses to angry prosody in meaningless speech. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 145–146.
13.
HahnS.GronlundS.D. (2007). Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 159–165.
14.
HuangY.M.BaddeleyA.YoungA.W. (2008). Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 328–339.
15.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326.
16.
MostS.B.ChunM.M.JohnsonM.R.KiehlK.A. (2006). Attentional modulation of the amygdala varies with personality. Neuroimage, 31, 934–944.
17.
Okon-SingerH.TzelgovJ.HenikA. (2007). Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli. Emotion, 7, 147–157.
18.
PessoaL.UngerleiderL.G. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 171–182.
19.
PhelpsE.A.LeDouxJ.E. (2005). Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron, 48, 175–187.
20.
PhelpsE.A.LingS.CarrascoM. (2006). Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17, 292–299.
21.
PourtoisG.SchwartzS.SeghierM.L.LazeyrasF.VuilleumierP. (2006). Neural systems for orienting attention to the location of threat signals: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 31, 920–933.
22.
PourtoisG.ThutG.Grave de PeraltaR.MichelC.VuilleumierP. (2005). Two electrophysiological stages of spatial orienting towards fearful faces: Early temporo-parietal activation preceding gain control in extrastriate visual cortex. Neuroimage, 26, 149–163.
23.
PurkisH.M.LippO.V. (2007). Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: Preferential attention without implicit valence. Emotion, 7, 314–323.
24.
RoweG.HirshJ.B.AndersonA.K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 383–388.
25.
VuilleumierP. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 585–594.
26.
VuilleumierP.DriverJ. (2007). Modulation of visual processing by attention and emotion: Windows on causal interactions between human brain regions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 837–855.
27.
VuilleumierP.RichardsonM.P.ArmonyJ.L.DriverJ.DolanR.J. (2004). Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1271–1278.
28.
WhalenP.J.KaganJ.CookR.G.DavisF.C.KimH.PolisS., et al. (2004). Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites. Science, 306, 2061.
