This article summarizes recent findings on infant word learning and recognition. Infants initially store very detailed representations of words, including details that are not truly necessary for word recognition. As they are exposed to more varied productions of words, they develop more sophisticated knowledge about which details are important, and streamline their representations, allowing them to better recognize words across different contexts, speakers, and environments.
JusczykP.W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. A clearly written and relatively comprehensive review for readers who wish to expand their knowledge on how infant speech perception leads to language acquisition.
2.
WerkerJ.F.YeungH.H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learningTrends in Cognitive Science, 9, 519–527. A more recent review of current theory on the relationship between speech perception and infant word learning.
3.
BerwickR.C. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BraineM.D.S.BrooksP.J. (1995). Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. InTomaselloM.MerrimanW.E.(Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
FennellC.T.WerkerJ.F. (2004). Infant attention to phonetic detail: Knowledge and familiarity effects. InBrugosA.MicciullaL.SmithC.E.(Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 165–176). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
6.
FernaldA.SwingleyD.PintoJ.P. (2001). When half a word is enough: Infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic informationChild Development, 72, 1003–1015.
7.
GómezR.L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structurePsychological Science, 13, 431–436.
8.
HollichG. (2006). Combining techniques to reveal emergent effects in infants' segmentation, word learning, and grammarLanguage & Speech, 49, 3–19.
9.
HollichG.GolinkoffR.M.Hirsh-PasekK. (2007). Young children associate novel words with complex objects rather than salient partsDevelopmental Psychology, 43, 1051–1061.
10.
HoustonD.M.JusczykP.W. (2000). The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infantsJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1570–1582.
11.
JusczykP.W.AslinR.N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speechCognitive Psychology, 29, 1–23.
12.
JusczykP.W.PisoniD.B.MullennixJ. (1992). Some consequences of talker variability on speech perception by 2-month-old infantsCognition, 43, 253–291.
13.
NaiglesL.R.HoffE. (2006). Verbs at the very beginning: Parallels between comprehension and input. InHirsh-PasekK.GolinkoffR.M.(Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
NewmanR.S. (2006). Perceptual restoration in toddlersPerception & Psychophysics, 68, 625–642.
15.
NewmanR.S.JusczykP.W. (1996). The cocktail party effect in infantsPerception & Psychophysics, 58, 1145–1156.
16.
SinghL.BortfeldH.MorganJ.L. (2002, November). Effects of variability on infant word recognition. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Somerville, MA.
17.
SinghL.MorganJ.L.WhiteK.S. (2004). Preference and processing: The role of speech affect in early spoken word recognitionJournal of Memory and Language, 51, 173–189.
18.
StagerC.L.WerkerJ.F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasksNature, 388, 381–382.
19.
SwingleyD.AslinR.N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-oldsPsychological Science, 13, 480–484.
20.
WerkerJ.F.CurtinS. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processingLanguage Learning & Development, 1, 197–234.
21.
YipM. (2002). Tone. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
