Traditional views of rationality posit general-purpose decision mechanisms based on logic or optimization. The study of ecological rationality focuses on uncovering the “adaptive toolbox” of domain-specific simple heuristics that real, computationally bounded minds employ, and explaining how these heuristics produce accurate decisions by exploiting the structures of information in the environments in which they are applied. Knowing when and how people use particular heuristics can facilitate the shaping of environments to engender better decisions.
GigerenzerG. (2002). Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon & Schuster.
2.
GigerenzerG.EngelC. (2006). Heuristics and the law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
GigerenzerG.SeltenR. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
PayneJ.W.BettmanJ.R.JohnsonE.J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ToddP.M.GigerenzerG. (2000). Simple heuristics that make us smart (précis). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 727–741.
6.
BröderA.SchifferS. (2003). “Take The Best” versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 277–293.
7.
ChaterN.OaksfordM.NakisaR.RedingtonM. (2003). Fast, frugal, and rational: How rational norms explain behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 63–86.
8.
GigerenzerG. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Viking Press.
9.
GigerenzerG.GoldsteinD.G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.
10.
GigerenzerG.ToddP.M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
HogarthR.M.KarelaiaN. (2006). “Take-the-Best” and other simple strategies: Why and when they work “well” with binary cues. Theory and Decision, 61, 205–249.
12.
HutchinsonJ.M.C.GigerenzerG. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69, 97–124.
13.
JohnsonE.J.GoldsteinD.G. (2003). Do defaults save lives?Science, 302, 1338–1339.
14.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
NewellB.R.WestonN.ShanksD.R. (2003). Empirical tests of a fast and frugal heuristic: Not everyone “takes-the-best”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 82–96.
16.
ReimerT.KatsikopoulosK.V. (2004). The use of recognition in group decision-making. Cognitive Science, 28, 1009–1029.
17.
RieskampJ.OttoP.E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207–236.
18.
SchoolerL.HertwigR. (2005). How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychological Review, 112, 610–628.
19.
ToddP.M.GigerenzerG. (2001). Shepard's mirrors or Simon's scissors?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 704–705.
20.
ToddP.M.GigerenzerG., & the ABC Research Group. (in press). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
