What is at Stake? A Response to Bevir and Rhodes

Akram S. and Marsh D. (2008) ‘Rethinking the concept of agency’, Available online at: david.marsh@anu.edu.au

Bang H. (2008) ‘Politics in the swing: Between democracy and good governance’, Paper for PSA Conference, Swansea, April 2008.

Bevir M. (1994) ‘Objectivity in history’, History and Theory, 33:3, 328–344.

Bevir M. (1999) The Logic of the History of Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Bevir M. and Rhodes R. (2003) Interpreting British Governance (London: Routledge).

Bevir M. and Rhodes R. (2006) Governance Narratives (London: Routledge).

Bevir M. and Rhodes R. (2008) ‘The Differentiated Polity as Narrative’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2008.00325.x.

Hay C. (2006) ‘Constructivist institutionalism’, in Rhodes R. A. W. Binder S. and Rockman B. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 56–74.

Marsh D. (2008a) ‘Stability and change: The last dualism?’, Available online at: david.marsh@anu.edu.au

Marsh D. (2008b) ‘Keeping ideas in their place: In praise of thin constructivism’, Available online at: david.marsh@anu.edu.au

Marsh D. (2008c) ‘Late modernity and the changing nature of politics’, Available online at: david.marsh@anu.edu.au

Marsh D. Richards R. and Smith M. (2003) Changing Patterns of Governance in the UK: Reinventing Whitehall (Basingstoke: Macmillan).

Rhodes R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (London: Open University Press).

Sayer A. (2000) Realism and Social Science (London: Sage).