This article examines the proposition put forward in a BBC documentary concerning ‘war on terror’ policies in recent decades that the British prime minister embraced the precautionary principle over his decision to go to war with Iraq. We argue that the conventional understandings of precaution that have been developed in the environmental arena do not translate well into the field of foreign policy. Our argument is buttressed by a content analysis of Tony Blair's speeches prior to the Iraq conflict of 2003. The analysis focuses on the ways the prime minister justified his decision to participate in the war in Iraq to the UK electorate. We conclude that, although understandings of precaution, particularly the ‘strong’ precautionary principle, do have problems when applied to this particular issue, and that the war was mainly based on a traditional ‘sound science’ foreign policy paradigm, the novel idea of using weaker forms of the precautionary principle in foreign policy is nevertheless intriguing, and warrants further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsE.ArmitageR. L.BennettW. J.BergnerJ.BoltonJ.DobrinaskyP.FukuyamaF.KaganR.KhalilzadZ.KristolW.PerleR.RodmanP. W.RumsfeldD.SchneiderW.JrWeberV.WolfowitzP.WoolseyR. J.ZoellickR. B. (1998) ‘Letter to President W.J. Clinton’, Project for the New American century, 26 January 1998, Available online at: http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm (accessed 17 October 2005).
2.
BBC (2004) ‘Documentary: “The Power of Nightmares’”, broadcast 11 March 2004, BBC 2, transcript from Information Clearing House. Available online at: http://www.informationcleraringhouse.info/video1040.htm (accessed 11 February 2005).
Department of the Environment (1988) Ministerial Declaration on Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea 24–25 November 1987 (London: HMSO).
13.
Department of the Environment (1990) This Common Inheritance (London: HMSO).
14.
FeintuckM. (2005) ‘Precautionary maybe, but what's the principle? The precautionary principle, the regulation of risk, and the public domain’, Journal of Law and Society, 32:3, 371–398.
15.
HarremoesP.GeeD.MacGarvinM.StirlingA.KeysJ.WynneB. (eds) (2002) The Precautionary Principle in the 20thCentury: Late Lessons from Early Warnings (London: Earthscan).
16.
HoggettP. (2005) ‘Iraq: Blair's mission impossible’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7:3, 418–428.
MearsheimerJ. J.WaltS. M. (2003) ‘An unnecessary war’, Prospect, March 2003.
22.
MorrisJ. (ed.) (2000) Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle (Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann).
23.
OreszczynS. (2004) Precautionary Expertise for GM Crops: National Report—United Kingdom, Precaution as Process, Milton Keynes: Centre for Technology Strategy (Milton Keynes: Faculty of Technology, The Open University).
24.
O'RiordanT.CameronJ. (eds) (1994) Interpreting the Precautionary Principle (London: Earthscan).
25.
RaffenspergerC.TicknerJ. A. (eds) (1999) Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle (Washington DC: Island Press).
26.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) (1998) Twenty-first Report: ‘Setting Environmental Standards’ (London: The Stationery Office).
27.
RuncimanD. (2004) ‘The precautionary principle’, London Review of Books, 26:7. Available online at: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n07/runc01_html (accessed on 19 September 2005).
28.
ShortC. (2005) ‘Clare short on why she quit Tony Blair's government in protest of the Iraq War & How British intelligence spied on UN Chief Kofi Annan’, Democracy Now, 15 February 2005, Available online at: http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/15/1518249 (accessed 2 November).
29.
StirlingA. (1999) On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk: A Synthesis Report on Case Studies (Brussels: European Scientific Observatory, EUR 19056 EN).
30.
SunsteinC. R. (2005) Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
31.
United Nations (1992) Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Decision IV/5 and Annex IV, Report of the Fourth Meeting of the Parties at the UNEP/Ozl.Pro.4/15, 25 November 1992.
32.
United Nations (1993) Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Volume 1: Resolutions Adopted by the Conference (New York: United Nations).
33.
US Commission on Ocean Policy (2004) Preliminary Report of the US Commission on Ocean Policy, Governor's Draft, Washington DC, April.
34.
WilliamsI. (2005) ‘Annan has paid his dues’, The Guardian, 20 September 2005, p. 28.
35.
Wynne, B. (1992) ‘Uncertainty and environmental: Learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm’, Global Environmental Change, June, 111–127.
