AllisonG. T. (1971) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: Little, Brown & Co).
2.
BacheI. and CatneyP. (2008) ‘Embryonic associationalism: New Labour and urban governance’, Public Administration, 86:2, 411–428.
3.
BeechM. (2011) ‘British conservatism and foreign policy: Traditions and ideas shaping Cameron's global view’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13:3, 348–363.
4.
BeloffM. (1955) Foreign Policy and the Democratic Process (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
5.
BevirM. (2010) Democratic Governance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
6.
BevirM. and HallI. (2011) ‘Global governance’, in BevirM. (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Governance (London: Sage), 356–366.
7.
BevirM. and RhodesR. A. W. (2003) Interpreting British Governance (London: Routledge).
8.
BevirM. and RhodesR. A. W. (2006) Governance Stories (London: Routledge).
9.
BevirM. and RhodesR. A. W. (2010) The State as Cultural Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
10.
BevirM. and RichardsD. (eds) (2009) ‘Decentring policy networks’, Public Administration, special issue, 88:1, 132–141.
11.
BevirM. and TrentmannF. (eds) (2007) Governance, Consumers, and Citizens: Agency and Resistance in Contemporary Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
12.
BevirM.RhodesR. and WellerP. (eds) (2003) ‘Traditions of governance: History and diversity’, Public Administration, special issue, 81:1, 1–17.
13.
BoothA. (2010) ‘The traditional standpoint of historians’: Tradition and the construction of educational identity in late twentieth-century British higher education’, Contemporary British History, 24:4, 493–509.
14.
BratburgO. (2011) ‘Ideas, tradition, and norm entrepreneurs: Retracing guiding principles of foreign policy in Blair and Chirac's speeches on Iraq’, Review of International Studies, 37:1, 327–348.
15.
BulleyD. (2009) ‘Textualising British politics: Deconstructing the subject of British foreign policy’, British Politics, 4:3, 291–314.
16.
BurkeA. (2008) Fear of Security: Australia's Invasion Anxiety (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
17.
CampbellD. (1998) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, revised edn. (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
18.
CarlsnaesW. (1992) ‘The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis’, International Studies Quarterly, 36:3, 245–270.
19.
ClarkK. and GainsF. (eds) (2007) ‘Constructing delivery: Implementation as an interpretive process’, Critical Policy Analysis, special issue, 1 & 2, 133–138.
20.
CoxR. W. (1996) ‘Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory’, in CoxR. W. with SinclairT. J. (ed.), Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 85–123.
21.
CraigD. (2006) ‘Community well-being strategy and the legacies of the new institutionalism and new public management in third way New Zealand’, in BauldL.ClarkeK. and MaltbyT. (eds), Social Policy Review 18: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy (Bristol: Policy Press), 193–220.
22.
DaddowO. and GaskarthJ. (eds) (2011) British Foreign Policy: The New Labour Years (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
23.
DaddowO. J. (2004) Britain and Europe since 1945: Historiographical Perspectives on Integration (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
24.
DaddowO. J. (2011) New Labour and the European Union: Blair and Brown's Logic of History (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
25.
DinhamA. and LowndesV. (2008) ‘Religion, resources, and representation: Three narratives of faith engagement in British urban governance’, Urban Affairs Review, 43:6, 817–845.
26.
DotyR. L. (1996) Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
27.
DudleyG. (2003) ‘Ideas, bargaining and flexible policy communities: Policy change and the case of the Oxford transport strategy’, Public Administration, 81:3, 433–458.
28.
DunneT. (2004) ‘“When the shooting starts”: Atlanticism in British security strategy’, International Affairs, 80:5, 893–909.
29.
EdwardsA. (2011) ‘Interpreting New Labour's political discourse on the peace process’, in HaywardK. and O'DonnellC. (eds), Political Discourse and Conflict Resolution: Debating Peace in Northern Ireland (Abingdon: Routledge), 46–61.
30.
FierkeK. (2007) Critical Approaches to International Security (Cambridge: Polity).
31.
FinlaysonA. (ed.) (2004) ‘The interpretive approach to political science: A symposium’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6:2, 129–164.
32.
FinlaysonA. (ed.) (2008) ‘Characterizing New Labour: The case of the child trust fund’, Public Administration, 86:1, 95–110.
33.
FinnemoreM. and SikkinkK. (1999) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52:4, 887–917.
34.
FioretosO. (2011) ‘Historical institutionalism in international relations’, International Organization, 65:2, 367–399.
35.
FrankelJ. (1963) The Making of Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Decision-Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
36.
GeorgeA. (1969) ‘The operational code: A neglected approach to the study of political decision-making’, International Studies Quarterly, 13, 190–222.
37.
GeorgeJ. and CampbellD. (1990) ‘Patterns of dissent and celebration of difference: Critical social theory and international relations’, International Studies Quarterly, 34:3, 269–293.
38.
GoldsteinJ. and KeohaneR. O. (eds) (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
HallI. (2006) The International Thought of Martin Wight (New York: Palgrave).
41.
HallI. (2012a) Dilemmas of Decline: British Intellectuals and World Politics, 1945–1975 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press GAIA).
42.
HallI. (2012b) ‘“Building the global network?” The reform of the foreign and commonwealth office under New Labour’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15:2, 228–245.
43.
HallI. and RenggerN. (2005) ‘The right that failed? The ambiguities of conservative thought and the dilemmas of conservative practice in international affairs’, International Affairs, 81:1, 69–82.
44.
HallR. B. and BierstekerT. J. (eds) (2002) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
45.
HermannM. G. (1980) ‘Explaining foreign policy behavior using the personal characteristics of leaders’, International Studies Quarterly, 24:1, 7–46.
46.
IrazabalC. (2005) City Making and Urban Governance in the Americas: Curitiba and Portland (London: Ashgate).
47.
JervisR. (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
48.
JonesR. (1974) The Changing Structure of British Foreign Policy (London: Longman).
49.
JoseJ. (2007) ‘Reframing the “governance” story’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 42:3, 455–470.
50.
KatzensteinP. (1996a) Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Post-War Japan (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
51.
KatzensteinP. (ed.) (1996b) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
52.
Keens-SoperM. (1999) Europe in the World: The Persistence of Power Politics (Houndmills: Macmillan).
53.
KennyC. (2010) ‘At ideological loggerheads: Identifying and clarifying the discursive differences between Blair and Brown on education’, British Politics, 5:3, 367–384.
54.
KeohaneR. O. (1988) ‘International institutions: Two approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, 32:4, 379–396.
55.
KruegerR. and GibbsD. (2010) ‘Competitive global city regions and “sustainable development”’, Environment and Planning A, 42:4, 821–837.
56.
LaffeyM. and WeldesA. J. (1997) ‘Beyond belief: Ideas and symbolic technologies in the study of international relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 3:2, 193–237.
57.
LarsonD. W. (1994) ‘The role of belief systems and schemas in foreign policy decision-making’, Political Psychology, 15:1, 17–33.
58.
MarshD. (2008) ‘Understanding British government: Analysing competing models’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10:2, 251–268.
59.
McDonaldM. (2005) ‘Constructing insecurity: Australian security discourse and policy post-2001’, International Relations, 19:3, 297–320.
60.
MearsheimerJ. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton).
61.
MonroS. (2006) ‘New institutionalism and sexuality at work in local government’, Gender, Work, and Organization, 14:1, 1–19.
62.
MorrellK. (2006) ‘Policy as narrative: New Labour's reform of the national health service’, Public Administration, 84:2, 367–385.
63.
NorthedgeF. S. (ed.) (1961) British Foreign Policy: The Process of Readjustment, 1945–1961 (London: Allen & Unwin).
64.
O'BrienM.AtkinsonA.BurtonD.CampbellA.QualterA. and Varga-AtkinsT. (2009) ‘Social inclusion and learning networks: “A wider notion of learning” or taking things in different direction’, Research Papers in Education, 24:1, 57–75.
65.
OnufN. (1989) World of Our Making: Rule and Rules in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press).
66.
OrrK. (2005) ‘Interpreting narratives of local government change under the conservatives and New Labour’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7:3, 371–385.
67.
OrrK. (2009) ‘Local government and structural crisis: An interpretive approach’, Policy and Politics, 37:1, 39–55.
68.
OrrK. and VinceR. (2009) ‘Traditions of local government’, Public Administration, 87:3, 655–677.
69.
ReynoldsD. (2000) Britannia Overruled: British Policy and World Power in the Twentieth Century (2nd edn.) (London: Longman).
70.
RhodesR.'t HartP. and NoordegraafM. (eds) (2007) Observing Government Elites: Up Close and Personal (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
71.
RichardsD. and MathersH. (2010) ‘Political memoirs and New Labour: Interpretations of power and the club rules’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12:4, 498–522.
72.
RichardsD. and SmithM. (2004) ‘Interpreting the world of political elites’, Public Administration, 82:4, 777–800.
73.
RisseT.RoppS. C. and SikkinkK. (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
74.
RoseG. (1998) ‘Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy’, World Politics, 51:1, 144–172.
75.
StokerG. (2006) ‘Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance?’, American Review of Public Administration, 36:1, 41–47.
76.
SullivanH. (2007) ‘Interpreting “community leadership” in English local government’, Policy and Politics, 35:1, 141–162.
77.
WallersteinI. (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
78.
WaltS. (1990) The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
79.
WaltzK. (1979) Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
80.
WeldesJ. (1996) ‘Constructing national interests’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:3, 275–318.
81.
WeldesJ. (1999) Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
82.
WendtA. (1987) ‘The agent-structure problem in international relations theory’, International Organization, 41:3, 335–370.
83.
WendtA. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics’, International Organization, 46:2, 391–425.
84.
WendtA. (1994) ‘Collective identity formation and the international state’, American Political Science Review, 88:2, 384–396.
85.
WendtA. (1995) ‘Constructing international politics’, International Security, 20:1, 71–81.
86.
WendtA. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
87.
WilliamsP. D. (2004) ‘Who's making UK foreign policy?’, International Affairs, 80:5, 909–929.
88.
WoodJ.FlemingJ. and MarksM. (2008) ‘Building the capacity of police change agents: The nexus policing project’, Policing and Society, 18:1, 72–87.
89.
Yi-ChongX. and WellerP. (2007) ‘To be, but not to be seen: Exploring the impact of international civil servants’, Public Administration, 86:1, 35–51.