This article addresses prominent, disruptive direct action around the climate change issue, in the context of comparable activity across a range of political groupings. It exposes the processes by which such activities are refracted through the conventional media and the web, in a way that comparable studies fail to do. Results suggest they garner significant but unflattering attention from the former, partly as a consequence of the persistent pressures and imperatives that drive conventional journalism. Moreover, they put a question mark against the notion of the web as an egalitarian, democratised, alternative and separate avenue of communication for the otherwise disadvantaged. The conclusions question the viability of direct action activity and the unforeseen consequences that follow, as well as the overall balance of forces in the pressure group domain.
AndersonJ. (2004) ‘Spatial politics in practice: The style and substance of environmental direct action’, Antipode, 36:1, 106–125.
2.
BBC Trust (2008) Service Review (London: BBC Trust).
3.
BennettW. L. (2003) ‘Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerability of networked politics’, Information, Communication & Society, 6:2, 143–168.
4.
BennettW. L.PickardV. W.IozziD. P.SchroederC. L.LagosT. and CaswellC. E. (2004) ‘Managing the public sphere: Journalistic construction of the great globalization debate’, Journal of Communication, 54:3, 437–455.
5.
BowsA. and AndersonK. (2007) ‘A bill we can't pay’, Parliamentary Brief, 11:4, 7–8.
6.
BrownH. (2002) ‘Information overload and the web—what is it? How does it affect users? How to cope’, Health Information on the Internet, August.
7.
CarterN. (2009) ‘Can the UK reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 2050?’, in GiddensA.LathamS. and LiddleR. (eds), Building a Low-Carbon Future: The Politics of Climate Change (London: The Policy Network), 111–119.
8.
CottleS. (2008) ‘Reporting demonstrations: The changing media politics of dissent’, Media, Culture and Society, 30:6, 853–872.
9.
CurrahA. (2009) What's Happening to Our News (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism).
10.
DeaconD. and GoldingP. (1994) Taxation and Representation: The Media, Political Communication and the Poll Tax (London: John Libbey).
11.
DeLucaK. M. and PeeplesJ. (2002) ‘From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism and the “violence” of Seattle’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19:2, 125–151.
12.
Di GennaroC. and DuttonW. (2006) ‘The Internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom’, Parliamentary Affairs, 59:2, 299–313.
13.
DohertyB. (1999) ‘Paving the way: The rise of direct action against road-building and the changing character of British environmentalism’, Political Studies, 47:2, 275–291.
14.
DohertyB.PlowsA. and WallD. (2003) ‘“The preferred way of doing things”: The British direct action movement’, Parliamentary Affairs, 56:4, 669–686.
15.
DohertyB.PlowsA. and WallD. (2007) ‘Environmental direct action in Manchester, Oxford and North Wales: A protest event analysis’, Environmental Politics, 16:5, 805–825.
16.
Environmental Audit Committee (2007) The EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Lessons for the Future (London: House of Commons).
17.
GavinN. T. (2007a) Press and Television in British Politics: Media, Money and Mediated Democracy (London: Palgrave-Macmillan).
18.
GavinN. T. (2007b) ‘Global warming and the British press: The emergence of an issue and its political implications’, Paper prepared for the 2007 Elections Public Opinion and Parties Conference, Bristol University, September.
19.
GavinN. T. (2007c) ‘The global warming issue in Britain and the politics of documentary journalism’, Paper prepared for the Political Studies Association, Media and Politics Group conference, University of Staffordshire, November.
20.
GavinN. T. (2009a) ‘Addressing climate change: A media perspective’, Environmental Politics, 18:5, 765–780.
21.
GavinN. T. (2009b) ‘The web and climate change: Lessons from Britain?’, in BoyceT. and LewisJ. (eds), Media and Climate Change (Oxford: Peter Lang), 129–142.
22.
GavinN. T. (2009c) ‘Researching mediated climate change: Some challenges’, Three:D—MeCCSA Newsletter, 13, 3–4.
23.
GavinN. T. (2010) ‘Climate change, flooding and the media in Britain’, Public Understanding of Science. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509353377.
24.
GavinN. T. and SandersD. (2003) ‘The press and its influence on British political attitudes under New Labour’, Political Studies, 51:3, 573–591.
25.
GerbnerG.GrossL.MorganM. and SignorielliN. (1986) ‘Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process’, in BryantJ. and ZillmanD. (eds), Perspectives on Media Effects (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 17–40.
26.
GibsonR. K.LusoliW. and WardS. (2005) ‘Online participation in the UK: Testing a “contextualised” model of Internet effects’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7:4, 561–583.
27.
GrantW. (2001) ‘Pressure politics: From “insider” politics to direct action’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54:2, 337–348.
28.
GriggsS. and HowarthD. (2008) ‘Populism, localism and environmental politics: The logic and rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion campaign’, Planning Theory, 7:2, 123–144.
29.
HaklayM. (2002) ‘Public environmental information: Understanding requirements and patterns of likely public use’, Area, 34:1, 17–28.
30.
HansenA. (1991) ‘The media and the social construction of the environment’, Media, Culture and Society, 13:4, 443–476.
31.
HarcupT. and O'NeillD. (2001) ‘What is news: Galtung and Ruge revisited’, Journalism Studies, 2:2, 261–280.
32.
HargreavesI. and ThomasJ. (2002) New News, Old News (London: ITV/BSC).
33.
IyengarS. (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
34.
JordanG. (1998) ‘Politics without parties: A growing trend’, Parliamentary Affairs, 51:3, 314–328.
35.
KleinN. (2009) ‘Seattle activism's coming of age will be very disobedient’, The Guardian, 13 November.
36.
LusoliW. (2005) ‘A second-order medium? The Internet as a source of electoral information in 25 European countries’, Information Polity, 10:3–4, 247–265.
37.
MalagaR. A. (2007) ‘The value of search engine optimization: An action research project at a new e-commerce site’, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 5:3, 68–82.
38.
McCombsM. E. (2005) ‘A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future’, Journalism Studies, 6:4, 543–557.
39.
McLeodD. C. and DetenberB. H. (1999) ‘Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest’, Journal of Communication, 49:3, 3–23.
40.
McQuailD. (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest (London: Sage).
41.
MillerK. (2005) Communications Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts (New York: McGraw-Hill).
42.
MonasterskyR. (2009) ‘A burden beyond bearing’, Nature, 458:7242, 1091–1094.
43.
MonbiotG. (2006) Heat (London: Penguin Books).
44.
MurdockG. (1984) ‘Reporting the riots: Images and impacts’, in BenyonJ. (ed.), Scarman and After: Essays Reflecting on Lord Scarman's Report, the Riots and their Aftermath (Oxford: Pergamon Press), 73–95.
45.
OatesS. (2008) An Introduction to Media and Politics (London: Sage).
46.
Ofcom (2007) New News, Future News: The Challenges for Television News after Digital Switch-Over (London: Ofcom).
47.
OwensL. and PalmerL. K. (2003) ‘Making the news: Anarchist counter-public relations on the World Wide Web’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20:4, 335–361.
48.
PatersonM. (2000) ‘Swampy fever: Media constructions and direct action politics’, in SeelB.PatersonM. and DohertyB. (eds), Direct Action in British Environmentalism (London: Routledge), 151–166.
49.
PickerillJ. (2007) ‘Autonomy online’: Indymedia and practices of alter-globalisation’, Environment and Planning A, 39:1, 2668–2684.
50.
PlowsA.WallD. and DohertyB. (2004) ‘Covert repertoires: Ecotage in the UK’, Social Movement Studies, 3:2, 199–219.
51.
RisbeyJ. S. (2008) ‘The new climate discourse: Alarmist or alarming’, Global Environmental Change, 18:1, 26–37.
52.
RodgersJ. (2003) Spatializing International Politics: Analysing Activism on the Internet (London: Routledge).
WeaverD. H. (2007) ‘Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming’, Journal of Communication, 57:1, 142–147.
55.
WorcesterR. M. and MortimoreR. (2001) ‘The 2001 British general election: The most boring election ever?’, Paper prepared for the Elections Public Opinion and Parties conference, University of Sussex, September.
