BeliaS.FidlerF.WilliamsJ.CummingG. (2004). Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals, and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170–180.
3.
CummingG.WilliamsJ.FidlerF. (2004). Replication, and researchers' understanding of confidence intervals and standard error bars. Understanding Statistics, 3, 299–311.
4.
EstesW.K. (1997). On the communication of information by displays of standard errors and confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 330–341.
5.
FidlerF.ThomasonN.CummingG.FinchS.LeemanJ. (2004). Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychological Science, 15, 119–126.
6.
GardnerM.J.AltmanD.G. (1986). Confidence intervals rather than P values: Estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal, 292, 746–750.
7.
KiefferK.M.ReeseR.J.ThompsonB. (2001). Statistical techniques employed in AERJ and JCP articles from 1988 to 1997: A methodological review. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 280–309.
8.
LoftusG.R.MassonM.E.J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
9.
MassonM.E.J.LoftusG.R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203–220.
10.
MaxwellS.E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147–163.
11.
RouderJ.N.MoreyR.D. (2005). Relational and arelational confidence intervals: A comment on Fidler, Thomason, Cumming, Finch, and Leeman (2004). Psychological Science, 16, 77–79.
12.
SavilleD.J. (2003). Basic statistics and the inconsistency of multiple comparison procedures. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 167–175.
13.
SchenkerN.GentlemanJ.F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55, 182–186.
14.
SchmidtF.L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.
15.
ThompsonB. (2002). What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educational Researcher, 31, 24–31.
16.
WilkinsonL., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.
17.
WolfeR.HanleyJ. (2002). If we're so different why do we keep overlapping? When 1 plus 1 doesn't make 2. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166, 65–66.
